Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF vs TeraWulf Inc — how do they compare? Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF trades at $309.39 (market cap $113.40B), while TeraWulf Inc trades at $13.77 (market cap $6.81B). The key difference: Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF is far larger — about 16.7× TeraWulf Inc's market cap, and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, TeraWulf Inc nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF for 54 Days and TeraWulf Inc for 17 Days on average.
| QQQM | WULF | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $113.40B | $6.81B |
Volume | 2,866,236 | 45,841,998 |
Sector | Broad Market / Factor | Financials |
52-Week High | $312.76 | $28.98 |
52-Week Low | $229.87 | $10.99 |
Typical Hold Time | 54 Days | 17 Days |
Enterprise Value | — | $9.43B |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
QQQM trades at $307.85, down 1.33% today, while maintaining a bullish technical outlook with strong moving average support. The Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF continues to benefit from institutional accumulation, with QRG Capital Management increasing its position by 207.5% in Q2 2026. Technical indicators show the ETF trading near key resistance at $309, with support established at $305 and $303 levels. The fund's 0.15% expense ratio provides a cost advantage over similar NASDAQ-100 tracking products.
QQQM offers efficient exposure to NASDAQ-100 growth stocks with lower fees, though concentration in technology sectors presents volatility risks. Institutional buying signals confidence in the ETF's long-term prospects despite recent market fluctuations. Investors should monitor technology sector performance and interest rate sensitivity as key drivers of future returns.
WULF trades at $13.65, down 5.21% today, amid a bearish technical signal and volatile AI infrastructure sector sentiment. The company reported a net loss of $661.42 million in 2025 with a negative net income margin of -392.64%, while revenue was $168.46 million. Recent news highlights its pivot to AI data centers, with stock movements influenced by sector-wide trends and analyst coverage.
Outlook remains speculative with high valuation ratios (P/S 35.73, P/B 46.24) and persistent losses posing risks, but 100% analyst buy ratings and a $34.92 consensus price target suggest long-term growth potential from AI hosting contracts. Key risks include execution challenges and competitive pressures in the evolving AI infrastructure space.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
QQQM is an ETF designed to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It provides exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ. Positioned as a lower-cost and more long-term-investor-friendly alternative to its peer QQQ, QQQM offers the same fundamental market exposure but typically has a lower share price and is structured to appeal to investors focused on accumulation rather than active trading.
Read more on QQQM →TeraWulf develops, owns, and operates fully integrated digital infrastructure powered by predominantly zero-carbon energy. It utilizes a hybrid business model that combines industrial-scale Bitcoin mining with high-performance computing (HPC) and AI hosting, leveraging sustainable power sources like nuclear and hydroelectric to deliver low-cost, energy-efficient data center solutions.
Read more on WULF →