Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF vs Thomson Reuters Corp — how do they compare? Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF trades at $289.35, while Thomson Reuters Corp trades at $87.84 (market cap $39.68B). The key difference: Thomson Reuters Corp pays a 2.89% dividend while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF pays none, and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Thomson Reuters Corp nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| QQQM | TRI | |
|---|---|---|
Sector | Broad Market / Factor | Industrials |
52-Week High | $307.23 | $205.54 |
52-Week Low | $228.02 | $76.55 |
Market Cap | — | $39.68B |
Enterprise Value | — | $41.64B |
Dividend Yield | — | 2.89% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
QQQM trades at $286.58 with minimal daily movement (+0.09%) amid bearish technical signals. The ETF faces headwinds from stretched tech valuations and rising AI competition, though recent Nasdaq-100 additions like SpaceX provide diversification. Technical indicators show oversold conditions with RSI at 22.39, while moving averages signal continued downward pressure.
The outlook remains cautious due to valuation concerns and sector rotation risks. However, the lower 0.15% expense ratio versus QQQ offers cost efficiency for long-term growth exposure. Key risks include AI market saturation and tech sector volatility, balanced by the fund's concentrated exposure to leading U.S. innovation companies.
Thomson Reuters (TRI) trades at $90.67, down 5.75% today, with a bullish technical outlook supported by moving averages. The company maintains strong profitability with a 19.93% net margin and 12.63% ROE, though recent earnings showed mixed results with a Q4 2025 miss. Recent developments include a joint venture with KKR for the global print business and strategic AI implementation, positioning TRI for future growth in content and technology services.
Wall Street remains optimistic with a $129.96 consensus price target (43% upside), driven by 51.85% buy ratings. Key risks include execution of AI strategy and competitive pressures. The stock offers value with reasonable valuation multiples (P/E 27.47, P/S 5.49) and consistent dividend payments, making it attractive for long-term investors despite near-term volatility.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
QQQM is an ETF designed to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It provides exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ. Positioned as a lower-cost and more long-term-investor-friendly alternative to its peer QQQ, QQQM offers the same fundamental market exposure but typically has a lower share price and is structured to appeal to investors focused on accumulation rather than active trading.
Read more on QQQM →Thomson Reuters is the result of the $17.6 billion megamerger of Canada's Thomson and the United Kingdom's Reuters Group in 2008 and the 2018 carve-out of its finance and risk business, Refinitiv, in which it holds a 45% stake. In 2019, the company agreed to exchange its 45% stake in Refinitiv for a 15% stake in LSE, which closed in early 2021. Since the divestiture, the company is more concentrated on selling its flagship legal data and software, Westlaw, and its tax accounting software, Onesource. Reuters sees roughly 80% of revenue and 70% of expenses attributed to the United States, while the remainder (largely through the global print and Reuters News segments) is distributed across Latin America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia-Pacific.
Read more on TRI →