Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF vs Teradyne, Inc. — how do they compare? Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF trades at $309.39 (market cap $113.40B), while Teradyne, Inc. trades at $402.68 (market cap $62.34B). The key difference: Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF is the larger of the two by market cap, and Teradyne, Inc. pays a 0.13% dividend while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF for 54 Days and Teradyne, Inc. for 37 Days on average.
| QQQM | TER | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $113.40B | $62.34B |
Volume | 2,866,236 | 3,368,404 |
Sector | Broad Market / Factor | Technology |
52-Week High | $312.76 | $483.84 |
52-Week Low | $229.87 | $132.05 |
Typical Hold Time | 54 Days | 37 Days |
Enterprise Value | — | $62.08B |
Dividend Yield | — | 0.13% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
QQQM trades at $307.85, down 1.33% on the day, with a bullish technical outlook supported by moving averages. The ETF benefits from Nasdaq-100 exposure and a competitive 0.15% expense ratio. Recent institutional buying includes QRG Capital Management increasing its position by 207.5% in Q2 2026. Technical indicators show support at $305 and resistance at $311.
The outlook remains positive given Nasdaq-100 strength and lower fees than QQQ. Risks include market concentration in technology stocks and potential tax implications of distributions. Analyst sentiment favors QQQM for core growth allocations, though some prefer equal-weight alternatives for diversification.
Teradyne (TER) trades at $398.72, down 3.17% on the day, but maintains a bullish technical outlook with strong support at $388 and resistance at $410. The company reported robust earnings beats in recent quarters, with Q2 2026 EPS of $2.47 exceeding the $2.09 estimate. Revenue for 2025 reached $3.19 billion, and net income margin stands at 25.77%. Recent developments include the launch of the Magnum E2 memory test system and Iris 100 for microLED devices, targeting AI and high-performance computing demand.
The outlook for TER is positive, driven by AI-driven test equipment demand and consistent earnings outperformance. Risks include reliance on semiconductor cycles and competitive pressure from peers like KLAC. Analysts are bullish with a consensus price target of $461.50, representing a 15.7% upside from the current price. Institutional buying and a lack of sell ratings underscore confidence in growth prospects.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
QQQM is an ETF designed to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It provides exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ. Positioned as a lower-cost and more long-term-investor-friendly alternative to its peer QQQ, QQQM offers the same fundamental market exposure but typically has a lower share price and is structured to appeal to investors focused on accumulation rather than active trading.
Read more on QQQM →Teradyne provides testing equipment, including automated test equipment for semiconductors, system testing for hard disk drives, circuit boards, and electronics systems and wireless testing for devices. The firm entered the industrial automation market in 2015, into which it sells collaborative and autonomous robots for factory applications. Teradyne serves numerous end markets and geographies directly and indirectly with its products, but its most significant exposure is to semiconductor testing, which made up 71% of 2021 sales. Teradyne serves vertically integrated, fabless, and foundry chipmakers with its equipment.
Read more on TER →