Compare Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) vs Redwire Corporation (RDW) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF vs Redwire Corporation — how do they compare? Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF trades at $309.39 (market cap $113.40B), while Redwire Corporation trades at $9.58 (market cap $2.44B). The key difference: Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF is far larger — about 46.5× Redwire Corporation's market cap, and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Redwire Corporation nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF for 54 Days and Redwire Corporation for 18 Days on average.
| QQQM | RDW | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $113.40B | $2.44B |
Volume | 2,866,236 | 11,053,212 |
Sector | Broad Market / Factor | Industrials |
52-Week High | $312.76 | $25.90 |
52-Week Low | $229.87 | $5.06 |
Typical Hold Time | 54 Days | 18 Days |
Enterprise Value | — | $1.97B |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
QQQM trades at $307.85, down 1.33% today, while maintaining a bullish technical outlook with strong moving average support. The Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF continues to benefit from institutional accumulation, with QRG Capital Management increasing its position by 207.5% in Q2 2026. Technical indicators show the ETF trading near key resistance at $309, with support established at $305 and $303 levels. The fund's 0.15% expense ratio provides a cost advantage over similar NASDAQ-100 tracking products.
QQQM offers efficient exposure to NASDAQ-100 growth stocks with lower fees, though concentration in technology sectors presents volatility risks. Institutional buying signals confidence in the ETF's long-term prospects despite recent market fluctuations. Investors should monitor technology sector performance and interest rate sensitivity as key drivers of future returns.
RDW trades at $9.76, down 4.69% on the day, reflecting a bearish technical trend. The company reported a net loss of $226.55M in 2025, with a negative net margin of -57.26%, though revenue grew to $335.38M. Recent news highlights strategic partnerships, including a $981M Space Force contract and collaborations with Honda and Sophia Space on robotics and orbital data centers, signaling growth potential in the space infrastructure sector.
The outlook is mixed: strong analyst consensus (80% buy ratings) and a $14.88 price target suggest upside, but persistent losses, negative cash flow from operations, and dependence on SpaceX's success pose significant risks. Investors face high volatility amid speculative growth prospects in the evolving space economy.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
QQQM is an ETF designed to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It provides exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ. Positioned as a lower-cost and more long-term-investor-friendly alternative to its peer QQQ, QQQM offers the same fundamental market exposure but typically has a lower share price and is structured to appeal to investors focused on accumulation rather than active trading.
Read more on QQQM →About Redwire Corporation
Redwire Corporation is a pure-play space infrastructure company that provides a wide range of advanced solutions for the next generation of space exploration and utilization. The company's capabilities span critical space technology, including on-orbit servicing, satellite components, space robotics, and digital engineering. Redwire's products and services are used by civil, commercial, and national security customers to enable missions from low Earth orbit to deep space.
Read more on RDW →
