ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF vs TeraWulf Inc — how do they compare? ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF trades at $98.43 (market cap $15.38B), while TeraWulf Inc trades at $13.77 (market cap $6.81B). The key difference: ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF is far larger — about 2.3× TeraWulf Inc's market cap, and ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, TeraWulf Inc nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF for 36 Days and TeraWulf Inc for 17 Days on average.
| QLD | WULF | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $15.38B | $6.81B |
Volume | 4,844,085 | 45,841,998 |
Sector | Leveraged / Inverse | Financials |
52-Week High | $100.77 | $28.98 |
52-Week Low | $57.16 | $10.99 |
Typical Hold Time | 36 Days | 17 Days |
Enterprise Value | — | $9.43B |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF) trades at $97.56, down 2.66% on the day, with technical indicators showing a bullish trend supported by moving averages while oscillators remain neutral. The ETF provides 2x leveraged exposure to the Nasdaq-100 index, positioned as a less volatile alternative to triple-leveraged products. Recent institutional buying and media coverage highlight investor interest in leveraged tech exposure amid market uncertainty.
The outlook for QLD hinges on Nasdaq-100 performance, with technical support at $96 and resistance at $100. While leveraged ETFs offer amplified returns, they carry elevated risk during market downturns. Current sentiment is cautiously optimistic, but investors should be aware of decay effects and interest rate sensitivity.
WULF trades at $13.65, down 5.21% today, amid a bearish technical signal and volatile AI infrastructure sector sentiment. The company reported a net loss of $661.42 million in 2025 with a negative net income margin of -392.64%, while revenue was $168.46 million. Recent news highlights its pivot to AI data centers, with stock movements influenced by sector-wide trends and analyst coverage.
Outlook remains speculative with high valuation ratios (P/S 35.73, P/B 46.24) and persistent losses posing risks, but 100% analyst buy ratings and a $34.92 consensus price target suggest long-term growth potential from AI hosting contracts. Key risks include execution challenges and competitive pressures in the evolving AI infrastructure space.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
QLD is a leveraged ETF that seeks daily investment results corresponding to 200% of the daily performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It achieves 2x leverage by investing in financial instruments such as swaps and is designed as a tactical trading tool for investors with a bullish (long) view on the NASDAQ-100. Due to the effects of compounding and leverage, the ETF is intended to be held for a single day and is not suitable for long-term investment.
Read more on QLD →TeraWulf develops, owns, and operates fully integrated digital infrastructure powered by predominantly zero-carbon energy. It utilizes a hybrid business model that combines industrial-scale Bitcoin mining with high-performance computing (HPC) and AI hosting, leveraging sustainable power sources like nuclear and hydroelectric to deliver low-cost, energy-efficient data center solutions.
Read more on WULF →