Compare ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF (QLD) vs United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF vs United States Natural Gas Fund — how do they compare? ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF trades at $90.15, while United States Natural Gas Fund trades at $10.02. The key difference: ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, United States Natural Gas Fund nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| QLD | UNG | |
|---|---|---|
Sector | Leveraged / Inverse | Commodities - Energy |
52-Week High | $100.53 | $16.90 |
52-Week Low | $57.16 | $9.63 |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF) trades at $90.53, down 0.17% with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF has delivered over 10,000% total return since inception, demonstrating powerful compounding. Recent institutional buying includes 180 Wealth Advisors increasing their position by 29.4% in Q2 2026. Technical indicators show strong moving average support but neutral oscillators, with key support at $88-90 and resistance at $91-93 levels.
As a daily leveraged ETF tracking the Nasdaq-100, QLD offers amplified exposure to large-cap tech but carries inherent volatility risks. The current neutral RSI and ADX suggest consolidation near support levels. Institutional accumulation and strong historical performance support long-term growth potential, though leveraged structure requires careful risk management during market turbulence.
UNG trades at $10.46, down 0.95% with a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF faces headwinds from high natural gas production and storage levels, though weather-driven demand provides some support. Recent EIA forecasts project record natural gas supply and demand through 2027, creating a mixed fundamental backdrop for this futures-based commodity ETF.
The outlook remains challenged by oversupply concerns, though long-term demand growth from LNG exports and data center power needs offers potential upside. Key risks include commodity price volatility and the structural limitations of futures-based ETFs versus equity-based alternatives like FCG.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF
QLD is a leveraged ETF that seeks daily investment results corresponding to 200% of the daily performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It achieves 2x leverage by investing in financial instruments such as swaps and is designed as a tactical trading tool for investors with a bullish (long) view on the NASDAQ-100. Due to the effects of compounding and leverage, the ETF is intended to be held for a single day and is not suitable for long-term investment.
Read more on QLD →About United States Natural Gas Fund
UNG is a commodity ETF that tracks the daily price movements of natural gas futures. It primarily invests in front-month contracts at the Henry Hub, making it a highly volatile tool for short-term trading rather than long-term holding due to contango and roll costs.
Read more on UNG →
