Compare ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF (QLD) vs Under Armour Inc Class A (UAA) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF vs Under Armour Inc Class A — how do they compare? ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF trades at $98.43 (market cap $15.38B), while Under Armour Inc Class A trades at $4.93 (market cap $2.07B). The key difference: ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF is far larger — about 7.4× Under Armour Inc Class A's market cap, and ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Under Armour Inc Class A nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF for 36 Days and Under Armour Inc Class A for 99 Days on average.
| QLD | UAA | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $15.38B | $2.07B |
Volume | 4,844,085 | 12,050,442 |
Sector | Leveraged / Inverse | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $100.77 | $8.14 |
52-Week Low | $57.16 | $4.17 |
Typical Hold Time | 36 Days | 99 Days |
Enterprise Value | — | $3.05B |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF) trades at $97.56, down 2.66% on the day, with technical indicators showing a bullish trend supported by moving averages while oscillators remain neutral. The ETF provides 2x leveraged exposure to the Nasdaq-100 index, positioned as a less volatile alternative to triple-leveraged products. Recent institutional buying and media coverage highlight investor interest in leveraged tech exposure amid market uncertainty.
The outlook for QLD hinges on Nasdaq-100 performance, with technical support at $96 and resistance at $100. While leveraged ETFs offer amplified returns, they carry elevated risk during market downturns. Current sentiment is cautiously optimistic, but investors should be aware of decay effects and interest rate sensitivity.
Under Armour (UAA) trades at $4.88, up 1.24% with a mixed technical picture showing bullish moving averages but neutral oscillators. The company faces fundamental challenges with negative net income margins (-9.99%) and declining revenue trends, though valuation metrics like P/S (0.42) appear attractive. Recent news highlights brand transformation efforts amid softer demand, with the company maintaining profitability outlook despite revenue cuts.
The outlook remains cautious with significant execution risks as Under Armour navigates weak consumer spending. Analyst consensus shows modest upside to the $5.79 price target, but persistent revenue declines and negative cash flow trends pose substantial headwinds for shareholder value recovery in the near term.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
About ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF
QLD is a leveraged ETF that seeks daily investment results corresponding to 200% of the daily performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It achieves 2x leverage by investing in financial instruments such as swaps and is designed as a tactical trading tool for investors with a bullish (long) view on the NASDAQ-100. Due to the effects of compounding and leverage, the ETF is intended to be held for a single day and is not suitable for long-term investment.
Read more on QLD →About Under Armour Inc Class A
Under Armour develops, markets, and distributes athletic apparel, footwear, and accessories in North America and other territories. Consumers of its apparel include professional and amateur athletes, sponsored college and professional teams, and people with active lifestyles. The company sells merchandise through direct-to-consumer, including e-commerce and more than 400 combined factory house and brand house stores, and wholesale channels. Under Armour also operates a digital fitness app called MapMyFitness. The Baltimore-based company was founded in 1996.
Read more on UAA →
