Compare Phillips 66 (PSX) vs United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Phillips 66 vs United States Natural Gas Fund — how do they compare? Phillips 66 trades at $262.98 (market cap $104.06B), while United States Natural Gas Fund trades at $10.05. The key difference: Phillips 66 pays a 1.95% dividend while United States Natural Gas Fund pays none, and Phillips 66 is trading nearer its 52-week high, United States Natural Gas Fund nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| PSX | UNG | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $104.06B | — |
Sector | Energy | Commodities - Energy |
52-Week High | $260.78 | $16.90 |
52-Week Low | $126.76 | $9.63 |
Enterprise Value | $120.52B | — |
Dividend Yield | 1.95% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Phillips 66 (PSX) trades at $259.14, up 1.59% over 24 hours and near its 52-week high, with bullish technical indicators and strong support at $258. The stock shows robust fundamentals, including a P/E of 14.79 and ROE of 24.02%, while recent quarterly earnings consistently beat expectations. Positive news highlights refining strength amid elevated energy prices, with institutional buying supporting momentum.
Outlook remains favorable due to earnings growth and cost initiatives, but risks include volatile refining margins and debt levels. Analysts are bullish with a $242.45 consensus target, though current price exceeds it, suggesting cautious optimism for further upside if operational targets are met.
UNG trades at $10.46, down 0.95% with a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF faces headwinds from high natural gas production and storage levels, though weather-driven demand provides some support. Recent EIA forecasts project record natural gas supply and demand through 2027, creating a mixed fundamental backdrop for this futures-based commodity ETF.
The outlook remains challenged by oversupply concerns, though long-term demand growth from LNG exports and data center power needs offers potential upside. Key risks include commodity price volatility and the structural limitations of futures-based ETFs versus equity-based alternatives like FCG.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About Phillips 66
Phillips 66 is an independent refiner with 12 refineries that have a total crude throughput capacity of 2.0 million barrels per day, or mmb/d, after converting its 255 mb/d Alliance refinery to a terminal. The midstream segment comprises extensive transportation and NGL processing assets. It also includes its DCP Midstream joint venture, which holds 45 natural gas processing facilities, 11 NGL fractionation plants, and a natural gas pipeline system with 58,000 miles of pipeline. Its CPChem chemical joint venture operates facilities in the United States and the Middle East and primarily produces olefins and polyolefins.
Read more on PSX →About United States Natural Gas Fund
UNG is a commodity ETF that tracks the daily price movements of natural gas futures. It primarily invests in front-month contracts at the Henry Hub, making it a highly volatile tool for short-term trading rather than long-term holding due to contango and roll costs.
Read more on UNG →
