Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare Phillips 66 (PSX) vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) Price & Performance

Phillips 66Trade
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETFTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

Phillips 66 vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF — how do they compare? Phillips 66 trades at $283.31 (market cap $112.36B), while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF trades at $308.99 (market cap $113.40B). The key difference: Phillips 66 and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF are close in size by market cap, and Phillips 66 pays a 1.8% dividend while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Phillips 66 for 62 Days and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF for 54 Days on average.

PSXQQQM
Market Cap
$112.36B$113.40B
Volume
2,374,7512,866,236
Sector
EnergyBroad Market / Factor
52-Week High
$281.60$312.76
52-Week Low
$126.76$229.87
Typical Hold Time
62 Days54 Days
Enterprise Value
$128.83B—
Dividend Yield
1.8%—

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

Phillips 66

Phillips 66 (PSX) trades at $271.62, up 0.68% with a bullish technical outlook near its 52-week high. The stock shows strong profitability with 24.02% ROE and 4.66% net margin, supported by three consecutive earnings beats. Recent news highlights structural refining advantages and AI implementation for operational efficiency. Current valuation metrics include a P/E of 16.07 and P/S of 0.75, suggesting reasonable pricing relative to peers.

PSX presents a compelling investment case with analyst consensus at Buy (54% rating) and $279 price target, though revenue declines from 2022-2025 pose concerns. Key risks include diesel export policy uncertainty and refining margin volatility. The company's debt reduction progress and projected 2026 earnings recovery to $7.1B support upside potential if operational execution continues.

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

QQQM trades at $308.42, down 1.15% on the day, while maintaining a bullish technical outlook with strong moving average support. The ETF's lower 0.15% expense ratio compared to QQQ's 0.18% provides a cost advantage, though trading spreads can impact returns. Recent institutional buying includes QRG Capital Management increasing its position by 207.5% during Q2 2026, signaling confidence in the Nasdaq-100 exposure.

The ETF offers pure Nasdaq-100 exposure with competitive fees, though investors should be aware of concentration risk in technology stocks and potential tax implications of distributions. Technical indicators suggest near-term support at $305 with resistance at $311, while institutional accumulation supports the bullish case for long-term growth investors.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Investor sentiment on Pluang

What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days

PSX
16% Buy84% Sell
Avg holding period · 62 Days
QQQM
77% Buy23% Sell
Avg holding period · 54 Days

Top news

Latest headlines on both assets

About Phillips 66

Phillips 66 is an independent refiner with 12 refineries that have a total crude throughput capacity of 2.0 million barrels per day, or mmb/d, after converting its 255 mb/d Alliance refinery to a terminal. The midstream segment comprises extensive transportation and NGL processing assets. It also includes its DCP Midstream joint venture, which holds 45 natural gas processing facilities, 11 NGL fractionation plants, and a natural gas pipeline system with 58,000 miles of pipeline. Its CPChem chemical joint venture operates facilities in the United States and the Middle East and primarily produces olefins and polyolefins.

Read more on PSX →

About Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

QQQM is an ETF designed to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It provides exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ. Positioned as a lower-cost and more long-term-investor-friendly alternative to its peer QQQ, QQQM offers the same fundamental market exposure but typically has a lower share price and is structured to appeal to investors focused on accumulation rather than active trading.

Read more on QQQM →