Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF vs Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund — how do they compare? Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $28.29 (market cap $335.90M), while Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund trades at $83.2 (market cap $13.50B). The key difference: Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund is far larger — about 40.2× Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund is trading nearer its 52-week high, Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF for 46 Days and Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund for 72 Days on average.
| PBW | XLP | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $335.90M | $13.50B |
Volume | 628,890 | 14,599,953 |
Sector | Sector/Thematic | — |
52-Week High | $46.99 | $90.00 |
52-Week Low | $28.29 | $75.61 |
Typical Hold Time | 46 Days | 72 Days |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
PBW, the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF, trades at $28.92, down 2.89% today amid a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF's unique selection criteria prioritize ecological factors over financial metrics, resulting in concentrated exposure to the clean energy sector. Recent institutional selling, including a 96.3% reduction by IFP Advisors Inc. in Q2 2026 (SEC filing, September 18, 2026), reflects cautious sentiment despite long-term growth drivers like energy security and data center demand.
Outlook remains challenged by near-term volatility and sector underperformance versus broad markets, though global investment in clean energy offers structural tailwinds. Key risks include oil price swings, Fed policy impacts, and lack of diversification. Investors face a trade-off between speculative growth potential and elevated sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts.
XLP trades at $81.70, showing slight weakness with a 0.09% decline amid bearish technical signals. The ETF maintains strong analyst support with a 100% buy rating from 2 analysts, though technical indicators show moving averages and overall signals are bearish. Recent news highlights XLP's defensive characteristics and competitive expense ratio advantage over peers.
The consumer staples ETF offers defensive exposure during market volatility, supported by positive sector performance in 2026. Key risks include interest rate sensitivity and potential consumer spending slowdowns. Analyst consensus remains bullish despite technical headwinds, positioning XLP as a core defensive holding.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →In seeking to track the performance of the index, the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 95%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index includes companies that have been identified as Consumer Staples companies by the GICS®. It is non-diversified.
Read more on XLP →