Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF vs TotalEnergies SE — how do they compare? Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $28.33 (market cap $335.90M), while TotalEnergies SE trades at $86.11 (market cap $191.82B). The key difference: TotalEnergies SE is far larger — about 571.1× Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and TotalEnergies SE pays a 4.93% dividend while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF for 46 Days and TotalEnergies SE for 90 Days on average.
| PBW | TTE | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $335.90M | $191.82B |
Volume | 628,890 | 3,311,339 |
Sector | Sector/Thematic | Energy |
52-Week High | $46.99 | $93.60 |
52-Week Low | $28.29 | $57.39 |
Typical Hold Time | 46 Days | 90 Days |
Enterprise Value | — | $222.81B |
Dividend Yield | — | 4.93% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
PBW (Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF) trades at $28.33, down 2.04% with a bearish technical signal. The ETF's unique selection criteria prioritize ecological factors over financial metrics, resulting in concentrated exposure to clean energy companies. Recent institutional selling by IFP Advisors (-96.3% position) reflects caution amid sector volatility. Technical indicators show mixed signals with neutral oscillators but bearish moving averages.
Clean energy ETFs face headwinds from oil price volatility and tech sector weakness, though long-term energy transition trends provide growth potential. Key risks include undiversified portfolio concentration, geopolitical energy market impacts, and Federal Reserve policy uncertainty. The ETF's performance remains tied to clean energy adoption rates and government policy support.
TotalEnergies (TTE) trades at $86.02, up 2.13% today, with a bearish technical signal but strong fundamentals including a P/E of 10.77 and ROE of 14.56%. Recent earnings beat expectations in Q1 and Q2 2026, and the company announced a $10 billion investment in Argentina and increased share buybacks to $2.5 billion, signaling growth commitment. Cash flow trends show a recovery to positive net cash flow in 2025 after declines in prior years.
The outlook is positive with a consensus price target of $95.33, representing 10.8% upside, supported by 55.88% analyst buy ratings. Risks include declining revenue from $263.3B in 2022 to $182.3B in 2025 and rising debt-to-asset ratio to 20.17% in 2025. Strategic investments in LNG and power diversification offer long-term growth, but oil price volatility and execution risks remain key concerns.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →TotalEnergies is an integrated oil and gas company that explores for, produces, and refines oil around the world. In 2021, it produced 1.5 million barrels of liquids and 7.2 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day. At year-end 2020, reserves stood at 12.1 billion barrels of oil equivalent, 45% of which are liquids. During 2021, it had LNG sales of 42 Mt. The company owns interests in refineries with capacity of nearly 1.8 million barrels a day, primarily in Europe, distributes refined products in 65 countries, and manufactures commodity and specialty chemicals. It also holds a 19% interest in Russian oil company Novatek. At year-end, its gross installed renewable power generation capacity was 10.3 GW.
Read more on TTE →