Compare Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) vs Schlumberger NV (SLB) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF vs Schlumberger NV — how do they compare? Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $28.29 (market cap $347.46M), while Schlumberger NV trades at $48.94 (market cap $71.18B). The key difference: Schlumberger NV is far larger — about 204.9× Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Schlumberger NV pays a 2.46% dividend while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF for 46 Days and Schlumberger NV for 99 Days on average.
| PBW | SLB | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $347.46M | $71.18B |
Volume | 413,698 | 14,872,321 |
Sector | Sector/Thematic | Energy |
52-Week High | $46.99 | $60.10 |
52-Week Low | $28.29 | $31.72 |
Typical Hold Time | 46 Days | 99 Days |
Enterprise Value | — | $79.91B |
Dividend Yield | — | 2.46% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
PBW, the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF, trades at $28.92, down 2.89% today amid a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF's unique selection criteria prioritize ecological factors over financial metrics, resulting in concentrated exposure to the clean energy sector. Recent institutional selling, including a 96.3% reduction by IFP Advisors Inc. in Q2 2026 (SEC filing, September 18, 2026), reflects cautious sentiment despite long-term growth drivers like energy security and data center demand.
Outlook remains challenged by near-term volatility and sector underperformance versus broad markets, though global investment in clean energy offers structural tailwinds. Key risks include oil price swings, Fed policy impacts, and lack of diversification. Investors face a trade-off between speculative growth potential and elevated sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts.
SLB trades at $47.96, down 4.08% in the last session, with technical indicators showing bearish momentum. The company maintains strong fundamentals with consistent earnings beats and a robust $35.71B revenue base, though 2025 net income declined to $3.37B. Recent contract wins in Saudi Arabia, Oman, and Mozambique provide multi-year revenue visibility, supporting analyst optimism with an 84.85% buy rating and $64.58 consensus price target.
SLB presents a compelling value opportunity with significant upside to analyst targets, driven by expanding international contracts and solid cash flow generation. Key risks include oil price volatility and execution challenges in new projects. The stock's current technical weakness may offer an attractive entry point for long-term investors seeking energy sector exposure.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
About Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →About Schlumberger NV
Schlumberger is the largest oilfield service firm in the world, with expertise in myriad disciplines, including reservoir performance, well construction, production enhancement, and more recently, digital solutions. It maintains a reputation as one of the industry's leading innovators, which has earned it dominant share in numerous end markets.
Read more on SLB →
