Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF vs Global X SuperDividend ETF — how do they compare? Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $28.43 (market cap $335.90M), while Global X SuperDividend ETF trades at $23.98 (market cap $1.17B). The key difference: Global X SuperDividend ETF is far larger — about 3.5× Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Global X SuperDividend ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF for 46 Days and Global X SuperDividend ETF for 47 Days on average.
| PBW | SDIV | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $335.90M | $1.17B |
Volume | 628,890 | 387,692 |
Sector | Sector/Thematic | Broad Market / Factor |
52-Week High | $46.99 | $26.34 |
52-Week Low | $28.29 | $22.90 |
Typical Hold Time | 46 Days | 47 Days |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
PBW, the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF, trades at $28.92, down 2.89% today amid a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF's unique selection criteria prioritize ecological factors over financial metrics, resulting in concentrated exposure to the clean energy sector. Recent institutional selling, including a 96.3% reduction by IFP Advisors Inc. in Q2 2026 (SEC filing, September 18, 2026), reflects cautious sentiment despite long-term growth drivers like energy security and data center demand.
Outlook remains challenged by near-term volatility and sector underperformance versus broad markets, though global investment in clean energy offers structural tailwinds. Key risks include oil price swings, Fed policy impacts, and lack of diversification. Investors face a trade-off between speculative growth potential and elevated sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts.
SDIV trades at $23.58, down 0.55% with a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF maintains an 8%+ dividend yield but faces scrutiny over principal erosion, having lost 66% since inception. Recent institutional buying by Ameritas Advisory contrasts with negative media coverage questioning sustainability of high yields amid capital depreciation.
Outlook remains challenged by structural underperformance versus benchmarks. The high yield attracts income seekers but masks negative growth and volatility risks. Investment case hinges on yield sustainability versus capital preservation, with analyst sentiment cautious given persistent track record of value destruction.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →SDIV is an ETF that invests in 100 of the highest dividend-yielding equity securities in the world. The fund seeks to provide a high level of income to investors by selecting companies from both developed and emerging markets that have historically provided high dividend yields. By diversifying globally, SDIV aims to mitigate risks associated with focusing on a single country, while offering monthly distributions to its shareholders.
Read more on SDIV →