Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF vs VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals — how do they compare? Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $28.26 (market cap $335.90M), while VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals trades at $61.08 (market cap $1.75B). The key difference: VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals is far larger — about 5.2× Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals is more actively traded (930,523 versus 628,890). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF for 46 Days and VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals for 50 Days on average.
| PBW | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $335.90M | $1.75B |
Volume | 628,890 | 930,523 |
Sector | Sector/Thematic | Sector/Thematic |
52-Week High | $46.99 | $109.53 |
52-Week Low | $28.29 | $60.58 |
Typical Hold Time | 46 Days | 50 Days |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
PBW, the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF, trades at $28.92, down 2.89% today amid a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF's unique selection criteria prioritize ecological factors over financial metrics, resulting in concentrated exposure to the clean energy sector. Recent institutional selling, including a 96.3% reduction by IFP Advisors Inc. in Q2 2026 (SEC filing, September 18, 2026), reflects cautious sentiment despite long-term growth drivers like energy security and data center demand.
Outlook remains challenged by near-term volatility and sector underperformance versus broad markets, though global investment in clean energy offers structural tailwinds. Key risks include oil price swings, Fed policy impacts, and lack of diversification. Investors face a trade-off between speculative growth potential and elevated sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts.
REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) trades at $61.88, down 2.99% with bearish technical signals dominating. The ETF faces pressure from rare earth sector volatility and mixed performance among constituent companies. Technical indicators show oversold conditions with RSI readings below 23, while ADX signals strong bearish momentum. Recent news highlights sector challenges including China's export controls and shifting trade policies affecting critical minerals.
The rare earth sector faces structural headwinds despite strategic importance. While U.S. supply chain development offers long-term potential, high volatility (~50% annualized) and China concentration pose significant risks. Current technical weakness suggests cautious approach until fundamental catalysts emerge from constituent company developments or policy shifts.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →REMX invests in global companies involved in producing, refining, and recycling rare earth and strategic metals. It provides targeted exposure to critical minerals used in high-tech and green energy, with top holdings like Albemarle and Pilbara Minerals.
Read more on REMX →