Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF — how do they compare? Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $28.16 (market cap $335.90M), while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF trades at $308.94 (market cap $113.40B). The key difference: Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF is far larger — about 337.6× Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF for 46 Days and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF for 54 Days on average.
| PBW | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $335.90M | $113.40B |
Volume | 628,890 | 2,866,236 |
Sector | Sector/Thematic | Broad Market / Factor |
52-Week High | $46.99 | $312.76 |
52-Week Low | $28.29 | $229.87 |
Typical Hold Time | 46 Days | 54 Days |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
PBW, the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF, trades at $28.92, down 2.89% today amid a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF's unique selection criteria prioritize ecological factors over financial metrics, resulting in concentrated exposure to the clean energy sector. Recent institutional selling, including a 96.3% reduction by IFP Advisors Inc. in Q2 2026 (SEC filing, September 18, 2026), reflects cautious sentiment despite long-term growth drivers like energy security and data center demand.
Outlook remains challenged by near-term volatility and sector underperformance versus broad markets, though global investment in clean energy offers structural tailwinds. Key risks include oil price swings, Fed policy impacts, and lack of diversification. Investors face a trade-off between speculative growth potential and elevated sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts.
QQQM trades at $308.42, down 1.15% on the day, while maintaining a bullish technical outlook with strong moving average support. The ETF's lower 0.15% expense ratio compared to QQQ's 0.18% provides a cost advantage, though trading spreads can impact returns. Recent institutional buying includes QRG Capital Management increasing its position by 207.5% during Q2 2026, signaling confidence in the Nasdaq-100 exposure.
The ETF offers pure Nasdaq-100 exposure with competitive fees, though investors should be aware of concentration risk in technology stocks and potential tax implications of distributions. Technical indicators suggest near-term support at $305 with resistance at $311, while institutional accumulation supports the bullish case for long-term growth investors.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →QQQM is an ETF designed to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It provides exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ. Positioned as a lower-cost and more long-term-investor-friendly alternative to its peer QQQ, QQQM offers the same fundamental market exposure but typically has a lower share price and is structured to appeal to investors focused on accumulation rather than active trading.
Read more on QQQM →