Compare Otis Worldwide Corp (OTIS) vs United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Otis Worldwide Corp vs United States Natural Gas Fund — how do they compare? Otis Worldwide Corp trades at $66 (market cap $25.17B), while United States Natural Gas Fund trades at $10.84 (market cap $517.27M). The key difference: Otis Worldwide Corp is far larger — about 48.7× United States Natural Gas Fund's market cap, and Otis Worldwide Corp pays a 2.66% dividend while United States Natural Gas Fund pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Otis Worldwide Corp for 65 Days and United States Natural Gas Fund for 22 Days on average.
| OTIS | UNG | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $25.17B | $517.27M |
Volume | 4,542,442 | 29,485,537 |
Sector | Industrials | Commodities - Energy |
52-Week High | $93.62 | $16.90 |
52-Week Low | $64.05 | $9.63 |
Typical Hold Time | 65 Days | 22 Days |
Enterprise Value | $33.20B | — |
Dividend Yield | 2.66% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Otis Worldwide trades at $65.74, down 1.07% with a bearish technical signal and recent earnings misses. The stock trades near its 52-week low with mixed analyst sentiment (46.7% buy, 46.7% hold) despite a consensus price target of $87.00. Revenue growth remains stable at $14.43B (2025) with 10.17% net margins, though service margins face pressure from labor costs. Recent CEO succession news and China project wins provide strategic context amid weak equipment demand.
The outlook balances stable service revenue against margin pressures and China exposure. Upside exists if service margins recover and modernization backlog converts, but near-term headwinds and technical weakness suggest cautious positioning. Key risks include prolonged China weakness and execution on cost controls.
UNG trades at $11.03, up 2.7% today, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages and neutral oscillators. The company reported a net income of $65.15 million in 2024 with no revenue, while cash flow from operations was positive at $47.54 million. Recent news highlights natural gas price volatility driven by record U.S. production and geopolitical tensions in the Middle East.
The outlook is mixed: strong profitability and low debt support fundamentals, but zero revenue and negative net cash flow pose risks. Geopolitical events and weather-dependent demand create volatility, making the stock sensitive to energy market shifts. Analyst sentiment is cautiously optimistic given the bullish technical setup.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Otis Worldwide Corp
Otis is the largest global elevator and escalator supplier by revenue with around one quarter of share excluding Japan. In 1854 Otis' founder and namesake, Elisha Graves Otis, invented a safety mechanism that prevented elevators from falling if the hoisting cable failed.The company's product and service lifecycle begins with installations of elevator units in new buildings, later selling maintenance services on the units, and eventually replacement of the units after the average 15-20 year useful life of an elevator. As the largest global OEM, over decades Otis has built a base of 2 million elevators under service. Its business model is much the same as that of its competitors Kone, Schindler, and Thyssenkrupp.
Read more on OTIS →About United States Natural Gas Fund
UNG is a commodity ETF that tracks the daily price movements of natural gas futures. It primarily invests in front-month contracts at the Henry Hub, making it a highly volatile tool for short-term trading rather than long-term holding due to contango and roll costs.
Read more on UNG →
