Compare Okta, Inc. (OKTA) vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Okta, Inc. vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF — how do they compare? Okta, Inc. trades at $231.63 (market cap $38.50B), while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF trades at $309.36 (market cap $113.40B). The key difference: Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF is far larger — about 2.9× Okta, Inc.'s market cap, and Okta, Inc. is trading nearer its 52-week high, Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Okta, Inc. for 44 Days and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF for 54 Days on average.
| OKTA | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $38.50B | $113.40B |
Volume | 2,479,621 | 2,866,236 |
Sector | Technology | Broad Market / Factor |
52-Week High | $220.21 | $312.76 |
52-Week Low | $62.93 | $229.87 |
Typical Hold Time | 44 Days | 54 Days |
Enterprise Value | $36.25B | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Okta's stock trades at $228.38, up 4.76% in the last 24 hours, reflecting strong momentum. The company has beaten earnings estimates for three consecutive quarters, with Q3 2026 results pending. Revenue growth is robust, rising from $1.3B in 2022 to $2.6B in 2025, and profitability has improved significantly, turning a net loss into a $28M profit. Technical indicators show a bullish trend, with the current price near resistance at $228. Recent news highlights Okta's strategic focus on AI agent security, positioning it for future growth in the cybersecurity sector.
The outlook for Okta is positive, driven by strong earnings performance, revenue expansion, and strategic initiatives in AI. However, risks include high valuation multiples, such as a P/E of 132.66, and competitive pressures in the cybersecurity space. Analyst consensus is overwhelmingly bullish, with 73.58% recommending Buy, but investors should monitor execution risks and market volatility.
QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) trades at $309.27, down 0.88% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF tracks the NASDAQ-100 index with a low 0.15% expense ratio. Recent institutional buying includes QRG Capital Management increasing its position by 207.5% during Q2 2026. Technical indicators show support at $305 and resistance at $311, with neutral oscillator readings suggesting balanced momentum.
The outlook remains positive given the NASDAQ-100's growth exposure and cost efficiency versus QQQ. Risks include market concentration in technology stocks and potential volatility from macroeconomic factors. Institutional accumulation and favorable expense structure support long-term positioning, though investors should monitor index composition changes and broader market trends.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Okta, Inc.
Okta is a cloud-native security company that focuses on identity and access management. The San Francisco-based firm went public in 2017 and focuses on two key client stakeholder groups: workforces and customers. Okta's workforce offerings enable a company's employees to securely access its cloud-based and on-premises resources. The firm's customer offerings allow its clients' customers to securely access the client's applications.
Read more on OKTA →About Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
QQQM is an ETF designed to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It provides exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ. Positioned as a lower-cost and more long-term-investor-friendly alternative to its peer QQQ, QQQM offers the same fundamental market exposure but typically has a lower share price and is structured to appeal to investors focused on accumulation rather than active trading.
Read more on QQQM →
