Oklo Inc vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Oklo Inc trades at $35.05 (market cap $6.85B), while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $28.29 (market cap $347.46M). The key difference: Oklo Inc is far larger — about 19.7× Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF is more actively traded (413,698 versus 11,387,867). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Oklo Inc for 31 Days and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF for 46 Days on average.
| OKLO | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $6.85B | $347.46M |
Volume | 11,387,867 | 413,698 |
Sector | Utilities | Sector/Thematic |
52-Week High | $174.14 | $46.99 |
52-Week Low | $34.57 | $28.29 |
Typical Hold Time | 31 Days | 46 Days |
Enterprise Value | $4.39B | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
OKLO trades at $36.82, down 4.49% on the day, with bearish technical indicators showing resistance at $37-38. The company shows no revenue in 2025 and negative net income of -$105.66M, though analyst consensus remains strongly bullish with a $78.63 price target. Recent news highlights nuclear energy sector momentum but notes OKLO's early commercialization stage and recent $1 billion stock sale.
Outlook hinges on project pipeline execution amid substantial cash burn. High institutional support via financing ($1.26B in 2025) fuels growth bets, but profitability remains distant with a -12,625.54% net margin. Risks include dilution from equity raises and intense SMR competition. The stock offers speculative upside if contracts materialize but carries high volatility.
PBW, the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF, trades at $28.92, down 2.89% today amid a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF's unique selection criteria prioritize ecological factors over financial metrics, resulting in concentrated exposure to the clean energy sector. Recent institutional selling, including a 96.3% reduction by IFP Advisors Inc. in Q2 2026 (SEC filing, September 18, 2026), reflects cautious sentiment despite long-term growth drivers like energy security and data center demand.
Outlook remains challenged by near-term volatility and sector underperformance versus broad markets, though global investment in clean energy offers structural tailwinds. Key risks include oil price swings, Fed policy impacts, and lack of diversification. Investors face a trade-off between speculative growth potential and elevated sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
Oklo Inc. is a company focused on developing and commercializing advanced fission power plants. The company specializes in micro-reactor technology, specifically the Aurora design, which uses advanced fuel to produce reliable, clean, and cost-competitive power. Oklo aims to provide scalable, on-site power solutions to various customers, including remote communities, industrial facilities, and government entities, positioning itself as an innovator in the next generation of nuclear energy.
Read more on OKLO →PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →