Compare New York Times Co (NYT) vs United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
New York Times Co vs United States Natural Gas Fund — how do they compare? New York Times Co trades at $75.56 (market cap $12.29B), while United States Natural Gas Fund trades at $10.41. The key difference: New York Times Co pays a 1.21% dividend while United States Natural Gas Fund pays none, and New York Times Co is trading nearer its 52-week high, United States Natural Gas Fund nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| NYT | UNG | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $12.29B | — |
Sector | Media | Commodities - Energy |
52-Week High | $85.86 | $16.90 |
52-Week Low | $51.43 | $10.15 |
Enterprise Value | $11.68B | — |
Dividend Yield | 1.21% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
The New York Times Company (NYSE: NYT) trades at $74.69, down 1.63% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages and recent earnings beats. Revenue grew to $2.82 billion in 2025, with net income margin expanding to 12.17%. The stock is supported by strong cash flow from operations of $584 million and a consensus analyst price target of $78.00. Recent news includes the company's motion to quash subpoenas related to reporting on Air Force One, highlighting ongoing legal and press freedom challenges.
Outlook remains positive with consistent earnings growth and a defensive profile amid geopolitical tensions, but risks include regulatory pressures and competitive threats to digital subscriptions. The stock offers a dividend yield with the next payment scheduled for July 23, 2026. Institutional sentiment is mixed with a majority hold rating, suggesting cautious optimism for near-term appreciation toward the price target.
UNG trades at $10.29, down 2.09% today, with a bearish technical signal driven by moving averages. The ETF tracks natural gas futures, facing volatility from weather and LNG demand shifts. Recent news highlights comparisons with equity-based natural gas ETFs like FCG, emphasizing UNG's direct exposure to Henry Hub spot prices.
Outlook remains tied to natural gas market dynamics, with risks from storage reports and production levels. Investment appeal hinges on commodity price speculation, but high volatility and lack of traditional fundamentals limit suitability for conservative investors.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About New York Times Co
New York Times Co is an American media company known for publishing its flagship newspaper, The New York Times. The company also operates the International New York Times newspaper, as well as digital properties such as nytimes and various smartphone applications. Circulation of The New York Times is the source of revenue for the company, followed by print and digital advertising and its paid digital-only subscription to The New York Times. The company has a daily print circulation of over 500,000 and 1,000,000 on Sundays. The source of growth for The New York Times is its digital subscription service, which has over 1,000,000 paid users.
Read more on NYT →About United States Natural Gas Fund
UNG is a commodity ETF that tracks the daily price movements of natural gas futures. It primarily invests in front-month contracts at the Henry Hub, making it a highly volatile tool for short-term trading rather than long-term holding due to contango and roll costs.
Read more on UNG →
