Compare New York Times Co (NYT) vs United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
New York Times Co vs United States Natural Gas Fund — how do they compare? New York Times Co trades at $66.6 (market cap $10.74B), while United States Natural Gas Fund trades at $10.05. The key difference: New York Times Co pays a 1.38% dividend while United States Natural Gas Fund pays none, and New York Times Co is trading nearer its 52-week high, United States Natural Gas Fund nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| NYT | UNG | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $10.74B | — |
Sector | Media | Commodities - Energy |
52-Week High | $85.86 | $16.90 |
52-Week Low | $54.66 | $9.63 |
Enterprise Value | $10.14B | — |
Dividend Yield | 1.38% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
The New York Times Company (NYT) trades at $67.96, up 1.01% today, with a neutral technical signal. Recent earnings beats in Q4 2025, Q1 2026, and Q2 2026 highlight strong operational performance, supported by rising revenue and net income margins. The stock's valuation metrics include a P/E of 28.32 and P/S of 3.75, while positive cash flow trends and a dividend payment reflect financial stability.
Outlook remains cautiously optimistic with a consensus price target of $76.00, offering potential upside. Key risks include ongoing legal challenges with OpenAI over copyright issues and competitive pressures in digital media. Institutional interest is evident, but regulatory and market sentiment uncertainties warrant monitoring for sustained growth.
UNG trades at $10.46, down 0.95% today, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages and neutral oscillators. Support and resistance cluster tightly around $10-$11. The fund tracks natural gas futures, facing headwinds from high production and storage levels, while demand forecasts remain strong for 2026-2027 per EIA (2026-09-09).
Outlook hinges on natural gas price volatility; upside exists if demand outpaces supply, but risks include oversupply and geopolitical impacts. Investors face contango roll costs in futures-based ETFs, contrasting with equity alternatives like FCG.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About New York Times Co
New York Times Co is an American media company known for publishing its flagship newspaper, The New York Times. The company also operates the International New York Times newspaper, as well as digital properties such as nytimes and various smartphone applications. Circulation of The New York Times is the source of revenue for the company, followed by print and digital advertising and its paid digital-only subscription to The New York Times. The company has a daily print circulation of over 500,000 and 1,000,000 on Sundays. The source of growth for The New York Times is its digital subscription service, which has over 1,000,000 paid users.
Read more on NYT →About United States Natural Gas Fund
UNG is a commodity ETF that tracks the daily price movements of natural gas futures. It primarily invests in front-month contracts at the Henry Hub, making it a highly volatile tool for short-term trading rather than long-term holding due to contango and roll costs.
Read more on UNG →
