New York Times Co vs Solaredge Technologies Inc — how do they compare? New York Times Co trades at $75.56 (market cap $12.29B), while Solaredge Technologies Inc trades at $50.3 (market cap $2.96B). The key difference: New York Times Co is far larger — about 4.2× Solaredge Technologies Inc's market cap, and New York Times Co pays a 1.21% dividend while Solaredge Technologies Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| NYT | SEDG | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $12.29B | $2.96B |
Sector | Media | Technology |
52-Week High | $85.86 | $78.51 |
52-Week Low | $51.43 | $24.42 |
Enterprise Value | $11.68B | $2.89B |
Dividend Yield | 1.21% | — |
Trailing returns across standard periods
New York Times Co is an American media company known for publishing its flagship newspaper, The New York Times. The company also operates the International New York Times newspaper, as well as digital properties such as nytimes and various smartphone applications. Circulation of The New York Times is the source of revenue for the company, followed by print and digital advertising and its paid digital-only subscription to The New York Times. The company has a daily print circulation of over 500,000 and 1,000,000 on Sundays. The source of growth for The New York Times is its digital subscription service, which has over 1,000,000 paid users.
Read more on NYT →SolarEdge Technologies designs, develops, and sells direct current optimized inverter systems for solar photovoltaic installations. The company system consists of power optimizers, inverters, and cloud-based monitoring platform and addresses a broad range of solar market segments, from residential solar installations to commercial and small utility-scale solar installations. The company sells its products directly to solar installers, engineering, procurement, and construction firms and indirectly to solar installers through distributors and electrical equipment wholesalers. Additionally, the company has nonsolar products targeting energy storage and e-mobility.
Read more on SEDG →