Compare New York Times Co (NYT) vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
New York Times Co vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF — how do they compare? New York Times Co trades at $66.32 (market cap $10.74B), while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF trades at $309.49 (market cap $113.40B). The key difference: Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF is far larger — about 10.6× New York Times Co's market cap, and New York Times Co pays a 1.38% dividend while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold New York Times Co for 81 Days and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF for 54 Days on average.
| NYT | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $10.74B | $113.40B |
Volume | 2,096,352 | 2,866,236 |
Sector | Media | Broad Market / Factor |
52-Week High | $85.86 | $312.76 |
52-Week Low | $54.66 | $229.87 |
Typical Hold Time | 81 Days | 54 Days |
Enterprise Value | $10.14B | — |
Dividend Yield | 1.38% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
The New York Times Company (NYSE: NYT) trades at $65.64, up 1.14% today, with a bullish technical signal and strong fundamentals. Revenue grew from $2.3B in 2022 to $2.8B in 2025, with net income margin expanding to 12.17%. Recent earnings beats and a declared $0.23 dividend highlight operational strength, though a shareholder lawsuit presents headline risk.
Outlook is positive given consistent earnings outperformance and analyst consensus target of $84.00, implying 28% upside. Key risks include the pending lawsuit's impact on reputation and competitive pressures in digital media. Cash flow generation remains robust, supporting dividend sustainability and growth initiatives.
QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) trades at $309.27, down 0.88% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF tracks the NASDAQ-100 index with a low 0.15% expense ratio. Recent institutional buying includes QRG Capital Management increasing its position by 207.5% during Q2 2026. Technical indicators show support at $305 and resistance at $311, with neutral oscillator readings suggesting balanced momentum.
The outlook remains positive given the NASDAQ-100's growth exposure and cost efficiency versus QQQ. Risks include market concentration in technology stocks and potential volatility from macroeconomic factors. Institutional accumulation and favorable expense structure support long-term positioning, though investors should monitor index composition changes and broader market trends.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About New York Times Co
New York Times Co is an American media company known for publishing its flagship newspaper, The New York Times. The company also operates the International New York Times newspaper, as well as digital properties such as nytimes and various smartphone applications. Circulation of The New York Times is the source of revenue for the company, followed by print and digital advertising and its paid digital-only subscription to The New York Times. The company has a daily print circulation of over 500,000 and 1,000,000 on Sundays. The source of growth for The New York Times is its digital subscription service, which has over 1,000,000 paid users.
Read more on NYT →About Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
QQQM is an ETF designed to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It provides exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ. Positioned as a lower-cost and more long-term-investor-friendly alternative to its peer QQQ, QQQM offers the same fundamental market exposure but typically has a lower share price and is structured to appeal to investors focused on accumulation rather than active trading.
Read more on QQQM →
