Compare New York Times Co (NYT) vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
New York Times Co vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? New York Times Co trades at $66.6 (market cap $10.47B), while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $28.29 (market cap $347.46M). The key difference: New York Times Co is far larger — about 30.1× Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and New York Times Co pays a 1.42% dividend while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold New York Times Co for 81 Days and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF for 46 Days on average.
| NYT | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $10.47B | $347.46M |
Volume | 1,998,850 | 413,698 |
Sector | Media | Sector/Thematic |
52-Week High | $85.86 | $46.99 |
52-Week Low | $54.66 | $28.29 |
Typical Hold Time | 81 Days | 46 Days |
Enterprise Value | $9.86B | — |
Dividend Yield | 1.42% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
The New York Times Company (NYT) trades at $64.90, up 1.3% with strong fundamentals including 12.17% net margin and consistent earnings beats. Technical indicators show bearish momentum with support at $62-64 and resistance at $65-67. Recent news highlights dividend declaration and ongoing AI copyright litigation.
Outlook remains positive with 35% analyst buy ratings and $84 consensus target, though legal risks and technical bearish signals warrant caution. Revenue growth trajectory and strong profitability support long-term value despite near-term headwinds.
PBW, the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF, trades at $28.92, down 2.89% today amid a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF's unique selection criteria prioritize ecological factors over financial metrics, resulting in concentrated exposure to the clean energy sector. Recent institutional selling, including a 96.3% reduction by IFP Advisors Inc. in Q2 2026 (SEC filing, September 18, 2026), reflects cautious sentiment despite long-term growth drivers like energy security and data center demand.
Outlook remains challenged by near-term volatility and sector underperformance versus broad markets, though global investment in clean energy offers structural tailwinds. Key risks include oil price swings, Fed policy impacts, and lack of diversification. Investors face a trade-off between speculative growth potential and elevated sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
About New York Times Co
New York Times Co is an American media company known for publishing its flagship newspaper, The New York Times. The company also operates the International New York Times newspaper, as well as digital properties such as nytimes and various smartphone applications. Circulation of The New York Times is the source of revenue for the company, followed by print and digital advertising and its paid digital-only subscription to The New York Times. The company has a daily print circulation of over 500,000 and 1,000,000 on Sundays. The source of growth for The New York Times is its digital subscription service, which has over 1,000,000 paid users.
Read more on NYT →About Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →
