Compare New York Times Co (NYT) vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
New York Times Co vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? New York Times Co trades at $66.6 (market cap $10.96B), while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $31.54. The key difference: New York Times Co pays a 1.35% dividend while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| NYT | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $10.96B | — |
Sector | Media | Sector/Thematic |
52-Week High | $85.86 | $46.99 |
52-Week Low | $54.66 | $24.75 |
Enterprise Value | $10.36B | — |
Dividend Yield | 1.35% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
The New York Times Company (NYT) trades at $67.96, up 1.01% today, with a neutral technical signal and mixed moving averages. Recent earnings have consistently beaten estimates, with Q2 2026 EPS of $0.69 exceeding the $0.663 forecast. Revenue growth is steady, rising from $2.3B in 2022 to $2.8B in 2025, with net profit margins improving to 12.17%. The company maintains strong cash flow from operations at $584.49M in 2025. Analyst consensus is a $76.00 price target, though the majority recommend Hold.
Outlook remains cautiously optimistic given earnings momentum and solid fundamentals, but risks include the ongoing OpenAI copyright lawsuit and competitive pressures in digital media. The stock offers potential upside to the consensus target, supported by institutional buying interest, though sentiment is tempered by regulatory and litigation uncertainties.
PBW (Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF) trades at $32.38, up 1.86% today, but technical indicators show a bearish trend with moving averages signaling selling pressure. The ETF's unique selection criteria focusing on ecological factors over financial metrics creates an undiversified portfolio that has underperformed broader markets. Recent market volatility from geopolitical tensions and tech sector sell-offs has impacted clean energy ETFs despite long-term growth catalysts.
The clean energy sector faces near-term headwinds from market volatility, though long-term prospects remain supported by global energy security concerns and substantial international investment. PBW's performance remains tied to clean energy adoption trends and policy developments, with current technical weakness suggesting cautious near-term positioning.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About New York Times Co
New York Times Co is an American media company known for publishing its flagship newspaper, The New York Times. The company also operates the International New York Times newspaper, as well as digital properties such as nytimes and various smartphone applications. Circulation of The New York Times is the source of revenue for the company, followed by print and digital advertising and its paid digital-only subscription to The New York Times. The company has a daily print circulation of over 500,000 and 1,000,000 on Sundays. The source of growth for The New York Times is its digital subscription service, which has over 1,000,000 paid users.
Read more on NYT →About Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →
