Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare NetEase Inc (NTES) vs Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF (VNQ) Price & Performance

NetEase IncTrade
Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETFTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

NetEase Inc vs Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF — how do they compare? NetEase Inc trades at $124.24 (market cap $76.09B), while Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF trades at $90.65 (market cap $70.80B). The key difference: NetEase Inc and Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF are close in size by market cap, and NetEase Inc pays a 2.45% dividend while Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold NetEase Inc for 73 Days and Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF for 113 Days on average.

NTESVNQ
Market Cap
$76.09B$70.80B
Volume
486,4476,073,580
Sector
Technology—
52-Week High
$152.85$100.95
52-Week Low
$109.26$87.00
Typical Hold Time
73 Days113 Days
Enterprise Value
$51.81B—
Dividend Yield
2.45%—

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

NetEase Inc

NetEase (NTES) trades at $119.6, down 0.84% on the day, with a neutral technical signal and mixed earnings history. The company reported Q2 2026 revenue growth of 8% year-over-year but missed EPS expectations. Strong fundamentals include a 27.88% net income margin and robust cash flow from operations of $50.74 billion in 2025. Analyst sentiment remains bullish with an 81.82% buy rating and a consensus price target of $168.00, suggesting significant upside potential from current levels.

The outlook for NTES is positive based on solid profitability and analyst confidence, though risks include earnings volatility and competitive pressures in the gaming sector. Investment opportunity lies in valuation expansion if the company can consistently meet earnings expectations and sustain its high margins. Key risks are execution missteps and broader market sentiment toward Chinese tech stocks.

Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF

VNQ trades at $89.35, up 0.74% today, but faces bearish technical signals with moving averages indicating selling pressure. The ETF has declined nearly 10% recently amid rising Treasury yields and Fed rate hikes, eroding its income appeal versus safer alternatives. Recent institutional buying by State Street Corp and Envestnet suggests some see value at current levels, while news highlights sector headwinds from interest rate sensitivity and oversupply concerns in certain real estate segments.

Outlook remains challenged by rising rates compressing REIT valuations, though contrarian investors see opportunity in discounted sector exposure. Key risks include prolonged high interest rates, economic slowdown impacting property demand, and competition from Treasury yields. The dividend yield advantage has narrowed significantly, requiring careful assessment of total return potential versus rate-sensitive alternatives.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Investor sentiment on Pluang

What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days

NTES
3% Buy97% Sell
Avg holding period · 73 Days
VNQ
100% Buy0% Sell
Avg holding period · 113 Days

About NetEase Inc

NetEase, which started on an internet portal service in 1997, is a leading online services provider in China. Its key services include online/mobile games, cloud music, media, advertising, email, live streaming, online education, and e-commerce. The company develops and operates some of the China's most popular PC client and mobile games, and it partners with global leading game developers, such as Blizzard Entertainment and Mojang (a Microsoft subsidiary).

Read more on NTES →

About Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF

The fund employs an indexing investment approach designed to track the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, an index made up of stocks of large, mid-size, and small US companies within the real estate sector. The Advisor attempts to replicate the target index by seeking to invest all of its assets in the stocks that make up the index, in order to hold each stock in approximately the same proportion as its weighting in the index. It is non-diversified.

Read more on VNQ →