Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) vs GeneDx Holdings Corp (WGS) Price & Performance

Northrop Grumman CorporationTrade
GeneDx Holdings CorpTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

Northrop Grumman Corporation vs GeneDx Holdings Corp — how do they compare? Northrop Grumman Corporation trades at $512.35 (market cap $74.42B), while GeneDx Holdings Corp trades at $61.92 (market cap $1.80B). The key difference: Northrop Grumman Corporation is far larger — about 41.3× GeneDx Holdings Corp's market cap, and Northrop Grumman Corporation pays a 1.79% dividend while GeneDx Holdings Corp pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.

NOCWGS
Market Cap
$74.42B$1.80B
Sector
IndustrialsTechnology
52-Week High
$768.02$167.51
52-Week Low
$496.02$34.51
Enterprise Value
$88.65B$1.80B
Dividend Yield
1.79%

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Top news

Latest headlines on both assets

About Northrop Grumman Corporation

Northrop Grumman is a defense contractor that is diversified across short-cycle and long-cycle businesses. The firm's segments include aeronautics, mission systems, defense services, and space systems. The company's aerospace segment creates the fuselage for the massive F-35 program and produces various piloted and autonomous flight systems. Mission systems creates a variety of sensors and processors for defense hardware. The defense systems segment is a long-range missile manufacturer. Finally, the company's space systems segment produces various space structures, sensors, and satellites.

Read more on NOC

About GeneDx Holdings Corp

GeneDx is a patient-centered health intelligence company that specializes in transforming healthcare through the application of genomics. It combines advanced technology with one of the world's largest rare disease genomic datasets to provide clinical-grade exome and genome sequencing, enabling precise and rapid diagnosis for patients with complex medical conditions.

Read more on WGS