Northrop Grumman Corporation vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF — how do they compare? Northrop Grumman Corporation trades at $480.06 (market cap $68.83B), while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF trades at $309.34 (market cap $113.40B). The key difference: Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF is the larger of the two by market cap, and Northrop Grumman Corporation pays a 2.04% dividend while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Northrop Grumman Corporation for 81 Days and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF for 54 Days on average.
| NOC | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $68.83B | $113.40B |
Volume | 1,081,989 | 2,866,236 |
Sector | Industrials | Broad Market / Factor |
52-Week High | $768.02 | $312.76 |
52-Week Low | $473.46 | $229.87 |
Typical Hold Time | 81 Days | 54 Days |
Enterprise Value | $82.81B | — |
Dividend Yield | 2.04% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Northrop Grumman (NOC) trades at $480.72, up 1.53% on the day, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages but strong fundamentals including a P/E of 15.4 and ROE of 26.96%. Recent quarterly EPS beats and a consensus analyst price target of $600.62 suggest upside potential, though the stock faces headwinds from Boeing's recent $20 billion Navy fighter contract win (Seeking Alpha, 2026-10-02).
The outlook for NOC is supported by a record backlog and defense budget tailwinds, but competitive pressures and execution risks on key programs like the B-21 bomber pose challenges. Analyst sentiment is predominantly bullish with 54% buy ratings, indicating confidence in long-term growth despite near-term volatility.
QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) trades at $309.27, down 0.88% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF tracks the NASDAQ-100 index with a low 0.15% expense ratio. Recent institutional buying includes QRG Capital Management increasing its position by 207.5% during Q2 2026. Technical indicators show support at $305 and resistance at $311, with neutral oscillator readings suggesting balanced momentum.
The outlook remains positive given the NASDAQ-100's growth exposure and cost efficiency versus QQQ. Risks include market concentration in technology stocks and potential volatility from macroeconomic factors. Institutional accumulation and favorable expense structure support long-term positioning, though investors should monitor index composition changes and broader market trends.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Latest headlines on both assets
Northrop Grumman is a defense contractor that is diversified across short-cycle and long-cycle businesses. The firm's segments include aeronautics, mission systems, defense services, and space systems. The company's aerospace segment creates the fuselage for the massive F-35 program and produces various piloted and autonomous flight systems. Mission systems creates a variety of sensors and processors for defense hardware. The defense systems segment is a long-range missile manufacturer. Finally, the company's space systems segment produces various space structures, sensors, and satellites.
Read more on NOC →QQQM is an ETF designed to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It provides exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ. Positioned as a lower-cost and more long-term-investor-friendly alternative to its peer QQQ, QQQM offers the same fundamental market exposure but typically has a lower share price and is structured to appeal to investors focused on accumulation rather than active trading.
Read more on QQQM →