Northrop Grumman Corporation vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Northrop Grumman Corporation trades at $481.1 (market cap $68.83B), while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $28.25 (market cap $335.90M). The key difference: Northrop Grumman Corporation is far larger — about 204.9× Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Northrop Grumman Corporation pays a 2.04% dividend while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Northrop Grumman Corporation for 81 Days and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF for 46 Days on average.
| NOC | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $68.83B | $335.90M |
Volume | 1,081,989 | 628,890 |
Sector | Industrials | Sector/Thematic |
52-Week High | $768.02 | $46.99 |
52-Week Low | $473.46 | $28.29 |
Typical Hold Time | 81 Days | 46 Days |
Enterprise Value | $82.81B | — |
Dividend Yield | 2.04% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Northrop Grumman (NOC) trades at $480.85, up 1.56% with recent earnings beats but faces technical bearish signals. The company maintains strong fundamentals with $41.95B revenue, 10.48% net margin, and attractive valuation at 15.4 P/E. Recent news highlights both contract wins and competitive losses, including Boeing's $20B Navy fighter award.
Outlook remains positive with analyst consensus at $600.62 target (25% upside) and 54% buy ratings. Key risks include defense contract volatility and competitive pressures, while strong backlog ($104.7B) and dividend growth support long-term value. The stock offers defensive exposure to elevated defense spending cycles.
PBW, the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF, trades at $28.92, down 2.89% today amid a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF's unique selection criteria prioritize ecological factors over financial metrics, resulting in concentrated exposure to the clean energy sector. Recent institutional selling, including a 96.3% reduction by IFP Advisors Inc. in Q2 2026 (SEC filing, September 18, 2026), reflects cautious sentiment despite long-term growth drivers like energy security and data center demand.
Outlook remains challenged by near-term volatility and sector underperformance versus broad markets, though global investment in clean energy offers structural tailwinds. Key risks include oil price swings, Fed policy impacts, and lack of diversification. Investors face a trade-off between speculative growth potential and elevated sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
Northrop Grumman is a defense contractor that is diversified across short-cycle and long-cycle businesses. The firm's segments include aeronautics, mission systems, defense services, and space systems. The company's aerospace segment creates the fuselage for the massive F-35 program and produces various piloted and autonomous flight systems. Mission systems creates a variety of sensors and processors for defense hardware. The defense systems segment is a long-range missile manufacturer. Finally, the company's space systems segment produces various space structures, sensors, and satellites.
Read more on NOC →PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →