Compare Nano Dimension Ltd - ADR (NNDM) vs Trip.com Group Ltd (TCOM) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Nano Dimension Ltd - ADR vs Trip.com Group Ltd — how do they compare? Nano Dimension Ltd - ADR trades at $1.55 (market cap $328.52M), while Trip.com Group Ltd trades at $38.9 (market cap $23.75B). The key difference: Trip.com Group Ltd is far larger — about 72.3× Nano Dimension Ltd - ADR's market cap, and Trip.com Group Ltd pays a 0.42% dividend while Nano Dimension Ltd - ADR pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Nano Dimension Ltd - ADR for 43 Days and Trip.com Group Ltd for 79 Days on average.
| NNDM | TCOM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $328.52M | $23.75B |
Volume | 1,160,945 | 2,089,737 |
Sector | Technology | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $2.14 | $78.96 |
52-Week Low | $1.21 | $37.96 |
Typical Hold Time | 43 Days | 79 Days |
Enterprise Value | -$76.33M | $15.91B |
Dividend Yield | — | 0.42% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
NNDM trades at $1.56, up 0.65% with a bearish technical signal. The company shows revenue growth from $102M in 2025 to $121M in 2026 but remains deeply unprofitable with a -135.18% net margin. Recent strategic moves include cost-cutting initiatives and board changes to improve capital allocation. Cash burn remains a concern despite $757M in cash reserves.
The outlook remains challenging due to persistent losses and negative cash flow. Investment opportunity exists if restructuring succeeds in achieving profitability. Key risks include execution on cost savings, competitive pressures in additive manufacturing, and reliance on strategic asset sales to fund operations.
Trip.com (TCOM) trades at $37.96, down 0.34% with bearish technical signals despite strong fundamentals. The company reported Q2 2026 earnings of $1.07 per share, beating expectations, with revenue reaching $62.41 billion in 2025 and net income margin of 36.9%. Recent regulatory challenges and market volatility have pressured the stock, though analyst consensus remains overwhelmingly positive with a $56.64 price target.
The stock presents a value opportunity with attractive valuation multiples (P/E 7.34, EV/EBITDA 3.43) but faces near-term headwinds from regulatory changes and competitive pressures. Strong cash flow generation and international expansion provide upside potential, though investors should monitor execution risks amid shifting market dynamics.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
About Nano Dimension Ltd - ADR
Nano Dimension Ltd is engaged in research and development of a three-dimensional printer that prints electronic circuit boards, also known as printed circuit boards, and ink materials and products based on nanotechnology. Its products consist of two main product lines - Dragonfly 2020 3D printer and proprietary ink products. The company's Dragonfly 2020 3D printer currently in development uses proprietary ink and integrated software to quickly create fully functioning PCB prototypes. Geographically, it generates maximum revenue from the USA followed by the Asia Pacific and Europe and Israel. It serves the Commercial, Research and Printing services industries.
Read more on NNDM →About Trip.com Group Ltd
Trip.com is the largest online travel agent in China and is positioned to benefit from the country's rising demand for higher-margin outbound travel as passport penetration is only 12% in China. The company generated about 78% of sales from accommodation reservations and transportation ticketing in 2020. The rest of revenue comes from package tours and corporate travel. Prior to the pandemic in 2019, the company generated 25% of revenue from international business, which is important to its margin expansion. Most of sales come from websites and mobile platforms, while the rest come from call centers. The competes in a crowded OTA industry in China, including Meituan, Alibaba-backed Fliggy, Toncheng, and Qunar. The company was founded in 1999 and listed on the Nasdaq in December 2003.
Read more on TCOM →
