Nomura Holdings Inc vs Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF — how do they compare? Nomura Holdings Inc trades at $9.58 (market cap $27.55B), while Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF trades at $220.37 (market cap $262.40B). The key difference: Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF is far larger — about 9.5× Nomura Holdings Inc's market cap, and Nomura Holdings Inc pays a 3.4% dividend while Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Nomura Holdings Inc for 55 Days and Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF for 142 Days on average.
| NMR | VTV | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $27.55B | $262.40B |
Volume | 782,470 | 3,293,281 |
Sector | Financials | — |
52-Week High | $10.86 | $227.51 |
52-Week Low | $6.73 | $182.86 |
Typical Hold Time | 55 Days | 142 Days |
Enterprise Value | $38.54T | — |
Dividend Yield | 3.4% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Nomura Holdings (NMR) trades at $9.53, down 2.56% today amid bearish technical signals. The stock shows mixed fundamentals with strong revenue growth to $1.66T in 2025 and net income margin of 20.4%, but recent earnings misses and negative operating cash flow raise concerns. Valuation appears reasonable with P/E of 11.33 and P/B of 1.15. Analyst sentiment is cautious with 67% hold ratings despite recent Zacks strong buy recommendations.
The outlook remains balanced - attractive valuation and revenue growth potential are offset by cash flow challenges and technical weakness. Key risks include Japan's fiscal policy impacts on bond markets and sustained negative operating cash flow. Investors should weigh the discounted valuation against execution risks in the current macroeconomic environment.
VTV trades at $219.97, up 0.81% with a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF shows neutral oscillator readings but faces selling pressure from institutional indicators. Recent news highlights value stock outperformance in 2026, with VTV beating growth counterparts by significant margins. The fund offers a 2.3% dividend yield and low 0.03% expense ratio, attracting income-focused investors amid market rotation from growth to value strategies.
VTV presents a compelling value proposition with strong 2026 performance and institutional accumulation. However, technical weakness and long-term underperformance versus broad market indices pose risks. The ETF's low-cost structure and dividend yield support defensive positioning, but investors should weigh recent momentum against historical tracking error concerns.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Nomura is Japan's largest broker, about twice the size of rival Daiwa Securities and roughly three times the size of the securities units of the three megabanks. It is also the largest asset-management company in Japan, with a similar size differential compared with its rivals. Despite its topnotch brand name in retail broking and asset management in Japan, Nomura has struggled to compete effectively in the institutional securities business against larger global rivals. In 2008, Nomura bought European and Asian assets of the failed Lehman Brothers, which led to a sharply higher cost base but did not provide commensurate revenue. Nomura has reduced the scale of these businesses but maintains its ambition to compete globally with the top players.
Read more on NMR →The fund employs an indexing investment approach designed to track the performance of the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, a broadly diversified index predominantly made up of value stocks of large US companies. The advisor attempts to replicate the target index by investing all, or substantially all, of its assets in the stocks that make up the index, holding each stock in approximately the same proportion as its weighting in the index.
Read more on VTV →