Compare Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR) vs Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF (VNQ) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Nomura Holdings Inc vs Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF — how do they compare? Nomura Holdings Inc trades at $9.52 (market cap $27.55B), while Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF trades at $90.26 (market cap $70.80B). The key difference: Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF is far larger — about 2.6× Nomura Holdings Inc's market cap, and Nomura Holdings Inc pays a 3.4% dividend while Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Nomura Holdings Inc for 55 Days and Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF for 112 Days on average.
| NMR | VNQ | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $27.55B | $70.80B |
Volume | 782,470 | 6,073,580 |
Sector | Financials | — |
52-Week High | $10.86 | $100.95 |
52-Week Low | $6.73 | $87.00 |
Typical Hold Time | 55 Days | 112 Days |
Enterprise Value | $38.54T | — |
Dividend Yield | 3.4% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Nomura Holdings (NMR) trades at $9.53, down 2.56% today amid bearish technical signals. The stock shows mixed fundamentals with strong revenue growth to $1.66T in 2025 and net income margin of 20.4%, but recent earnings misses and negative operating cash flow raise concerns. Valuation appears reasonable with P/E of 11.33 and P/B of 1.15. Analyst sentiment is cautious with 67% hold ratings despite recent Zacks strong buy recommendations.
The outlook remains balanced - attractive valuation and revenue growth potential are offset by cash flow challenges and technical weakness. Key risks include Japan's fiscal policy impacts on bond markets and sustained negative operating cash flow. Investors should weigh the discounted valuation against execution risks in the current macroeconomic environment.
VNQ trades at $90.02, up 1.5% today amid a bearish technical trend. The ETF faces pressure from rising Treasury yields, with moving averages signaling sell conditions. Recent news highlights institutional buying despite sector headwinds, as REITs grapple with interest rate sensitivity and valuation concerns. The dividend yield remains a focal point, though competition from T-bills challenges its income appeal.
Outlook: Near-term risks from Fed policy and sector rotation persist, but contrarian opportunities exist for long-term investors. Key risks include interest rate volatility and economic slowdowns, while potential upside hinges on rate stabilization and real estate demand recovery.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
About Nomura Holdings Inc
Nomura is Japan's largest broker, about twice the size of rival Daiwa Securities and roughly three times the size of the securities units of the three megabanks. It is also the largest asset-management company in Japan, with a similar size differential compared with its rivals. Despite its topnotch brand name in retail broking and asset management in Japan, Nomura has struggled to compete effectively in the institutional securities business against larger global rivals. In 2008, Nomura bought European and Asian assets of the failed Lehman Brothers, which led to a sharply higher cost base but did not provide commensurate revenue. Nomura has reduced the scale of these businesses but maintains its ambition to compete globally with the top players.
Read more on NMR →About Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF
The fund employs an indexing investment approach designed to track the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, an index made up of stocks of large, mid-size, and small US companies within the real estate sector. The Advisor attempts to replicate the target index by seeking to invest all of its assets in the stocks that make up the index, in order to hold each stock in approximately the same proportion as its weighting in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on VNQ →
