Nomura Holdings Inc vs TORM plc — how do they compare? Nomura Holdings Inc trades at $9.49 (market cap $28.05B), while TORM plc trades at $39.91 (market cap $4.04B). The key difference: Nomura Holdings Inc is far larger — about 6.9× TORM plc's market cap, and TORM plc pays the higher dividend (11.36%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Nomura Holdings Inc for 55 Days and TORM plc for 23 Days on average.
| NMR | TRMD | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $28.05B | $4.04B |
Volume | 729,574 | 2,225,810 |
Sector | Financials | Industrials |
52-Week High | $10.86 | $41.05 |
52-Week Low | $6.73 | $19.39 |
Typical Hold Time | 55 Days | 23 Days |
Enterprise Value | $38.55T | $4.75B |
Dividend Yield | 3.4% | 11.36% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Nomura Holdings (NMR) trades at $9.54, down 2.45% today, with a bearish technical signal despite recent earnings beats. The company shows strong fundamentals with revenue growth from $1.38T in 2024 to $1.66T in 2025 and net income surging to $340.74B. Valuation metrics appear attractive with P/E of 11.29 and P/B of 1.15, while analyst consensus leans toward Hold (66.67%) with some positive momentum coverage from Zacks.
The outlook presents a mixed picture - strong profitability and reasonable valuation support upside potential, but negative operating cash flows and increasing debt-to-asset ratios pose significant risks. Recent technical weakness suggests near-term pressure, though fundamental strength could drive recovery if earnings momentum continues.
TRMD trades at $38.92, down 0.33% on the day, with strong profitability metrics including 35.52% net income margin and 26.84% ROE. The stock shows bullish technical signals with moving averages supporting upward momentum, though RSI suggests mild overbought conditions. Recent earnings showed mixed results with Q2 2026 missing expectations, while analyst consensus remains unanimously bullish with 100% buy ratings. The company maintains robust cash flow generation with $710M operating cash flow projected for 2026.
TRMD presents attractive valuation with P/E of 6.4 and EV/EBITDA of 5.11, supported by strong dividend yield from upcoming $2.40 payment. Key risks include spot rate volatility in tanker markets and recent insider selling activity. The fundamental outlook remains positive given projected revenue growth to $1.8B in 2026, though investors should monitor freight rate trends and competitive pressures in the product tanker sector.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
Nomura is Japan's largest broker, about twice the size of rival Daiwa Securities and roughly three times the size of the securities units of the three megabanks. It is also the largest asset-management company in Japan, with a similar size differential compared with its rivals. Despite its topnotch brand name in retail broking and asset management in Japan, Nomura has struggled to compete effectively in the institutional securities business against larger global rivals. In 2008, Nomura bought European and Asian assets of the failed Lehman Brothers, which led to a sharply higher cost base but did not provide commensurate revenue. Nomura has reduced the scale of these businesses but maintains its ambition to compete globally with the top players.
Read more on NMR →TORM plc is one of the world's largest owners and operators of product tankers, specializing in the transportation of refined oil products like gasoline, jet fuel, and diesel. Operating under its integrated 'One TORM' model, the company maintains a modern, wholly-owned fleet of nearly 90 vessels. It is widely recognized by investors for its aggressive variable dividend policy, which returns a significant portion of its cash flow directly to shareholders during periods of high freight rates.
Read more on TRMD →