Nomura Holdings Inc vs Trip.com Group Ltd — how do they compare? Nomura Holdings Inc trades at $9.59 (market cap $27.55B), while Trip.com Group Ltd trades at $38.9 (market cap $23.75B). The key difference: Nomura Holdings Inc is the larger of the two by market cap, and Nomura Holdings Inc pays the higher dividend (3.4%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Nomura Holdings Inc for 55 Days and Trip.com Group Ltd for 79 Days on average.
| NMR | TCOM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $27.55B | $23.75B |
Volume | 782,470 | 2,089,737 |
Sector | Financials | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $10.86 | $78.96 |
52-Week Low | $6.73 | $37.96 |
Typical Hold Time | 55 Days | 79 Days |
Enterprise Value | $38.54T | $15.91B |
Dividend Yield | 3.4% | 0.42% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Nomura Holdings (NMR) trades at $9.54, up 0.1% today, with a bearish technical signal but strong fundamental metrics including a P/E of 11.33 and net income margin of 20.4%. Revenue grew to $1.66 trillion in 2025, and the stock has recently been added to Zacks Strong Buy lists, indicating positive momentum recognition. Cash flow trends show variability, with 2025 net cash flow positive at $126.42 billion despite negative operating cash flow.
The outlook is mixed; solid profitability and low valuation ratios support upside potential, but recent earnings misses and a bearish technical backdrop pose near-term risks. Analyst consensus leans hold (66.67%), suggesting cautious optimism. Key risks include debt level increases and macroeconomic sensitivity affecting Japan's bond market, as noted by Nomura's own analysis.
Trip.com (TCOM) trades at $37.96, down 0.34% with bearish technical signals despite strong fundamentals. The company reported Q2 2026 EPS of $1.07, beating expectations by 22%, with revenue growth of 6% year-over-year. Recent regulatory penalties and algorithm changes create headwinds, but analyst consensus remains strongly bullish with a $56.64 price target representing 49% upside potential from current levels.
The stock presents a compelling value opportunity with attractive valuation multiples (P/E 7.34, EV/EBITDA 3.43) and robust profitability (36.9% net margin). However, regulatory risks from recent antitrust actions and technical weakness require careful monitoring. Institutional sentiment remains positive despite near-term volatility, suggesting potential for recovery as travel demand continues to normalize.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Nomura is Japan's largest broker, about twice the size of rival Daiwa Securities and roughly three times the size of the securities units of the three megabanks. It is also the largest asset-management company in Japan, with a similar size differential compared with its rivals. Despite its topnotch brand name in retail broking and asset management in Japan, Nomura has struggled to compete effectively in the institutional securities business against larger global rivals. In 2008, Nomura bought European and Asian assets of the failed Lehman Brothers, which led to a sharply higher cost base but did not provide commensurate revenue. Nomura has reduced the scale of these businesses but maintains its ambition to compete globally with the top players.
Read more on NMR →Trip.com is the largest online travel agent in China and is positioned to benefit from the country's rising demand for higher-margin outbound travel as passport penetration is only 12% in China. The company generated about 78% of sales from accommodation reservations and transportation ticketing in 2020. The rest of revenue comes from package tours and corporate travel. Prior to the pandemic in 2019, the company generated 25% of revenue from international business, which is important to its margin expansion. Most of sales come from websites and mobile platforms, while the rest come from call centers. The competes in a crowded OTA industry in China, including Meituan, Alibaba-backed Fliggy, Toncheng, and Qunar. The company was founded in 1999 and listed on the Nasdaq in December 2003.
Read more on TCOM →