Nomura Holdings Inc vs iShares Silver Trust — how do they compare? Nomura Holdings Inc trades at $10.84 (market cap $31.31B), while iShares Silver Trust trades at $61.19. The key difference: Nomura Holdings Inc pays a 3.05% dividend while iShares Silver Trust pays none, and Nomura Holdings Inc is trading nearer its 52-week high, iShares Silver Trust nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| NMR | SLV | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $31.31B | — |
Sector | Financials | — |
52-Week High | $10.65 | $105.57 |
52-Week Low | $6.73 | $37.41 |
Dividend Yield | 3.05% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Nomura Holdings (NMR) trades at $10.63, down 0.19% on the day, with a bullish technical signal driven by moving averages. Recent earnings show mixed quarterly performance but strong annual growth, with revenue reaching $1.66 trillion in 2025 and net income margin at 20.4%. The stock is supported by positive momentum coverage and a solid ROE of 11.03%.
Outlook remains favorable due to valuation metrics like a P/E of 12.46 and bullish analyst sentiment, though risks include volatile cash flows and rising debt-to-asset ratios. Investment opportunity lies in continued wholesale segment growth and ROE expansion, balanced by execution risks in a competitive financial sector.
SLV, the iShares Silver Trust ETF, trades at $59.37, down 0.75% on the day, with a bearish technical signal driven by moving averages. The ETF lacks traditional valuation metrics like P/E or P/B as it tracks physical silver. Recent news highlights silver's volatility amid Fed policy uncertainty and geopolitical tensions, with institutional buying noted in Q2 2026 filings.
Outlook remains mixed: silver's structural deficit supports prices, but Fed rate risks and dollar fluctuations pose headwinds. Investors face volatility from industrial demand shifts and inflation data, with technical resistance near $60–$61 capping near-term upside.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Nomura is Japan's largest broker, about twice the size of rival Daiwa Securities and roughly three times the size of the securities units of the three megabanks. It is also the largest asset-management company in Japan, with a similar size differential compared with its rivals. Despite its topnotch brand name in retail broking and asset management in Japan, Nomura has struggled to compete effectively in the institutional securities business against larger global rivals. In 2008, Nomura bought European and Asian assets of the failed Lehman Brothers, which led to a sharply higher cost base but did not provide commensurate revenue. Nomura has reduced the scale of these businesses but maintains its ambition to compete globally with the top players.
Read more on NMR →The ETF seeks to reflect such performance before payment of the ETF's expenses and liabilities. It is not actively managed. The ETF does not engage in any activities designed to obtain a profit from, or to ameliorate losses caused by, changes in the price of silver.
Read more on SLV →