Compare Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR) vs Quantumscape Corp (QS) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Nomura Holdings Inc vs Quantumscape Corp — how do they compare? Nomura Holdings Inc trades at $9.49 (market cap $28.05B), while Quantumscape Corp trades at $4.67 (market cap $2.78B). The key difference: Nomura Holdings Inc is far larger — about 10.1× Quantumscape Corp's market cap, and Nomura Holdings Inc pays a 3.4% dividend while Quantumscape Corp pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Nomura Holdings Inc for 55 Days and Quantumscape Corp for 37 Days on average.
| NMR | QS | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $28.05B | $2.78B |
Volume | 729,574 | 11,236,221 |
Sector | Financials | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $10.86 | $18.44 |
52-Week Low | $6.73 | $4.52 |
Typical Hold Time | 55 Days | 37 Days |
Enterprise Value | $38.55T | $1.99B |
Dividend Yield | 3.4% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Nomura Holdings (NMR) trades at $9.54, down 2.45% today, with a bearish technical signal despite recent earnings beats. The company shows strong fundamentals with revenue growth from $1.38T in 2024 to $1.66T in 2025 and net income surging to $340.74B. Valuation metrics appear attractive with P/E of 11.29 and P/B of 1.15, while analyst consensus leans toward Hold (66.67%) with some positive momentum coverage from Zacks.
The outlook presents a mixed picture - strong profitability and reasonable valuation support upside potential, but negative operating cash flows and increasing debt-to-asset ratios pose significant risks. Recent technical weakness suggests near-term pressure, though fundamental strength could drive recovery if earnings momentum continues.
QuantumScape (QS) trades at $4.58, down 1.51% on the day, with a bearish technical outlook and no current revenue generation. The company reported a net loss of $435.05 million in 2025 and faces significant execution risks as it develops solid-state battery technology. Analyst sentiment is cautious with 73% hold ratings, though the consensus price target of $10.35 suggests potential upside if commercialization milestones are met.
QS represents a high-risk, high-reward opportunity in the pre-revenue EV battery space. The primary investment thesis hinges on successful commercialization of solid-state batteries by 2029, but competition and execution delays pose substantial risks. Current negative ROE of -39.08% and cash burn require careful monitoring of funding runway and partnership developments with automotive manufacturers.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Nomura Holdings Inc
Nomura is Japan's largest broker, about twice the size of rival Daiwa Securities and roughly three times the size of the securities units of the three megabanks. It is also the largest asset-management company in Japan, with a similar size differential compared with its rivals. Despite its topnotch brand name in retail broking and asset management in Japan, Nomura has struggled to compete effectively in the institutional securities business against larger global rivals. In 2008, Nomura bought European and Asian assets of the failed Lehman Brothers, which led to a sharply higher cost base but did not provide commensurate revenue. Nomura has reduced the scale of these businesses but maintains its ambition to compete globally with the top players.
Read more on NMR →About Quantumscape Corp
QuantumScape Corp is engaged in the development of next-generation solid-state lithium-metal batteries for use in electric vehicles. It developed anode-less cell design, which delivers high energy density while lowering material costs and simplifying manufacturing.
Read more on QS →
