Nomura Holdings Inc vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF — how do they compare? Nomura Holdings Inc trades at $9.48 (market cap $27.55B), while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF trades at $310 (market cap $113.40B). The key difference: Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF is far larger — about 4.1× Nomura Holdings Inc's market cap, and Nomura Holdings Inc pays a 3.4% dividend while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Nomura Holdings Inc for 55 Days and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF for 54 Days on average.
| NMR | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $27.55B | $113.40B |
Volume | 782,470 | 2,866,236 |
Sector | Financials | Broad Market / Factor |
52-Week High | $10.86 | $312.76 |
52-Week Low | $6.73 | $229.87 |
Typical Hold Time | 55 Days | 54 Days |
Enterprise Value | $38.54T | — |
Dividend Yield | 3.4% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Nomura Holdings (NMR) trades at $9.53, down 2.56% today amid bearish technical signals. The stock shows mixed fundamentals with strong revenue growth to $1.66T in 2025 and net income margin of 20.4%, but recent earnings misses and negative operating cash flow raise concerns. Valuation appears reasonable with P/E of 11.33 and P/B of 1.15. Analyst sentiment is cautious with 67% hold ratings despite recent Zacks strong buy recommendations.
The outlook remains balanced - attractive valuation and revenue growth potential are offset by cash flow challenges and technical weakness. Key risks include Japan's fiscal policy impacts on bond markets and sustained negative operating cash flow. Investors should weigh the discounted valuation against execution risks in the current macroeconomic environment.
QQQM trades at $312.01, down 0.24% on the day, with a bullish technical outlook supported by moving averages but showing overbought conditions on shorter-term RSI readings. The ETF maintains its focus on Nasdaq-100 exposure with a competitive 0.15% expense ratio. Recent institutional activity shows increased interest, with QRG Capital Management boosting its position by 207.5% in Q2 2026.
The ETF's outlook remains positive given Nasdaq-100 leadership, though investors should monitor valuation levels and potential market rotation. Key risks include technology sector concentration and market volatility, while the lower fee structure provides a structural advantage for long-term holders seeking Nasdaq-100 exposure.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
Nomura is Japan's largest broker, about twice the size of rival Daiwa Securities and roughly three times the size of the securities units of the three megabanks. It is also the largest asset-management company in Japan, with a similar size differential compared with its rivals. Despite its topnotch brand name in retail broking and asset management in Japan, Nomura has struggled to compete effectively in the institutional securities business against larger global rivals. In 2008, Nomura bought European and Asian assets of the failed Lehman Brothers, which led to a sharply higher cost base but did not provide commensurate revenue. Nomura has reduced the scale of these businesses but maintains its ambition to compete globally with the top players.
Read more on NMR →QQQM is an ETF designed to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It provides exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ. Positioned as a lower-cost and more long-term-investor-friendly alternative to its peer QQQ, QQQM offers the same fundamental market exposure but typically has a lower share price and is structured to appeal to investors focused on accumulation rather than active trading.
Read more on QQQM →