Nomura Holdings Inc vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Nomura Holdings Inc trades at $9.4 (market cap $27.46B), while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $33.9. The key difference: Nomura Holdings Inc pays a 3.45% dividend while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays none, and Nomura Holdings Inc is trading nearer its 52-week high, Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| NMR | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $27.46B | — |
Sector | Financials | Sector/Thematic |
52-Week High | $10.04 | $46.99 |
52-Week Low | $6.39 | $22.23 |
Dividend Yield | 3.45% | — |
Trailing returns across standard periods
Nomura is Japan's largest broker, about twice the size of rival Daiwa Securities and roughly three times the size of the securities units of the three megabanks. It is also the largest asset-management company in Japan, with a similar size differential compared with its rivals. Despite its topnotch brand name in retail broking and asset management in Japan, Nomura has struggled to compete effectively in the institutional securities business against larger global rivals. In 2008, Nomura bought European and Asian assets of the failed Lehman Brothers, which led to a sharply higher cost base but did not provide commensurate revenue. Nomura has reduced the scale of these businesses but maintains its ambition to compete globally with the top players.
Read more on NMR →PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →