Nomura Holdings Inc vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Nomura Holdings Inc trades at $9.49 (market cap $28.05B), while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $28.29 (market cap $347.46M). The key difference: Nomura Holdings Inc is far larger — about 80.7× Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Nomura Holdings Inc pays a 3.4% dividend while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Nomura Holdings Inc for 55 Days and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF for 46 Days on average.
| NMR | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $28.05B | $347.46M |
Volume | 729,574 | 413,698 |
Sector | Financials | Sector/Thematic |
52-Week High | $10.86 | $46.99 |
52-Week Low | $6.73 | $28.29 |
Typical Hold Time | 55 Days | 46 Days |
Enterprise Value | $38.55T | — |
Dividend Yield | 3.4% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Nomura Holdings (NMR) trades at $9.54, down 2.45% today, with a bearish technical signal despite recent earnings beats. The company shows strong fundamentals with revenue growth from $1.38T in 2024 to $1.66T in 2025 and net income surging to $340.74B. Valuation metrics appear attractive with P/E of 11.29 and P/B of 1.15, while analyst consensus leans toward Hold (66.67%) with some positive momentum coverage from Zacks.
The outlook presents a mixed picture - strong profitability and reasonable valuation support upside potential, but negative operating cash flows and increasing debt-to-asset ratios pose significant risks. Recent technical weakness suggests near-term pressure, though fundamental strength could drive recovery if earnings momentum continues.
PBW, the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF, trades at $28.92, down 2.89% today amid a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF's unique selection criteria prioritize ecological factors over financial metrics, resulting in concentrated exposure to the clean energy sector. Recent institutional selling, including a 96.3% reduction by IFP Advisors Inc. in Q2 2026 (SEC filing, September 18, 2026), reflects cautious sentiment despite long-term growth drivers like energy security and data center demand.
Outlook remains challenged by near-term volatility and sector underperformance versus broad markets, though global investment in clean energy offers structural tailwinds. Key risks include oil price swings, Fed policy impacts, and lack of diversification. Investors face a trade-off between speculative growth potential and elevated sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Nomura is Japan's largest broker, about twice the size of rival Daiwa Securities and roughly three times the size of the securities units of the three megabanks. It is also the largest asset-management company in Japan, with a similar size differential compared with its rivals. Despite its topnotch brand name in retail broking and asset management in Japan, Nomura has struggled to compete effectively in the institutional securities business against larger global rivals. In 2008, Nomura bought European and Asian assets of the failed Lehman Brothers, which led to a sharply higher cost base but did not provide commensurate revenue. Nomura has reduced the scale of these businesses but maintains its ambition to compete globally with the top players.
Read more on NMR →PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →