Newmont Corporation vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Newmont Corporation trades at $117.58 (market cap $119.64B), while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $28.29 (market cap $347.46M). The key difference: Newmont Corporation is far larger — about 344.3× Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Newmont Corporation pays a 0.92% dividend while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Newmont Corporation for 58 Days and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF for 46 Days on average.
| NEM | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $119.64B | $347.46M |
Volume | 4,343,460 | 413,698 |
Sector | Basic Materials | Sector/Thematic |
52-Week High | $135.14 | $46.99 |
52-Week Low | $78.63 | $28.29 |
Typical Hold Time | 58 Days | 46 Days |
Enterprise Value | $116.23B | — |
Dividend Yield | 0.92% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
NEM trades at $115.55, down 0.72% on the day, with a bearish technical signal but strong fundamentals. Recent earnings beats and record free cash flow of $5.3B in H1 2026 highlight operational strength. The stock is supported by a 75.68% analyst buy rating and a consensus price target of $136.83, though it faces near-term resistance at $116.
The outlook remains positive given robust profitability and growth, but risks include gold price volatility and execution of per-share growth targets. Upside potential exists if the company continues to exceed earnings expectations and maintains its cash flow momentum.
PBW, the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF, trades at $28.92, down 2.89% today amid a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF's unique selection criteria prioritize ecological factors over financial metrics, resulting in concentrated exposure to the clean energy sector. Recent institutional selling, including a 96.3% reduction by IFP Advisors Inc. in Q2 2026 (SEC filing, September 18, 2026), reflects cautious sentiment despite long-term growth drivers like energy security and data center demand.
Outlook remains challenged by near-term volatility and sector underperformance versus broad markets, though global investment in clean energy offers structural tailwinds. Key risks include oil price swings, Fed policy impacts, and lack of diversification. Investors face a trade-off between speculative growth potential and elevated sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
Newmont Corp is primarily a gold producer with operations and/or assets in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Dominican Republic, Peru, Suriname, Argentina, Chile, Australia, and Ghana. It is also engaged in the production of copper, silver, lead and zinc. The company's operations are organized in five geographic regions: North America, South America, Australia, Africa and Nevada.
Read more on NEM →PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →