Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare Nebius Group NV (NBIS) vs Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) Price & Performance

Nebius Group NVTrade
Thomson Reuters CorpTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

Nebius Group NV vs Thomson Reuters Corp — how do they compare? Nebius Group NV trades at $226.21 (market cap $59.73B), while Thomson Reuters Corp trades at $102.99 (market cap $43.89B). The key difference: Nebius Group NV is the larger of the two by market cap, and Thomson Reuters Corp pays a 2.58% dividend while Nebius Group NV pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Nebius Group NV for 24 Days and Thomson Reuters Corp for 63 Days on average.

NBISTRI
Market Cap
$59.73B$43.89B
Volume
21,563,7001,648,199
Sector
TechnologyIndustrials
52-Week High
$286.69$163.45
52-Week Low
$73.87$76.55
Typical Hold Time
24 Days63 Days
Enterprise Value
$61.86B$46.51B
Dividend Yield
—2.58%

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

Nebius Group NV

NBIS trades at $237.07, down 5.08% on the day, amid mixed technical signals with a bullish moving average trend but neutral oscillators. The company shows strong revenue growth with $529.8M in 2025 revenue and a $37B backlog, though profitability remains challenged with a net margin of 3.13%. Recent news highlights significant AI infrastructure deals with Meta, Nvidia, and Palantir, while analyst consensus remains strongly bullish with 82% buy ratings.

The outlook for NBIS is growth-focused but carries execution risks. The stock offers substantial upside to the $272.70 consensus target, supported by AI infrastructure demand and strategic partnerships. Key risks include high valuation multiples (P/E 912), negative cash flow from investing activities, and insider selling. Investors should weigh the company's rapid expansion against its current profitability challenges and competitive pressures in the AI cloud sector.

Thomson Reuters Corp

Thomson Reuters (TRI) trades at $99.28, up 1.21% today, with strong technical momentum and bullish moving average signals. The company demonstrates solid fundamentals with 10% organic growth in core businesses and a 21.22% net income margin. Recent strategic moves include divesting its print unit to focus on technology offerings and launching its proprietary AI model, positioning for future growth.

TRI presents a compelling investment case with analyst consensus targeting $133.25 (34% upside) and strong institutional support. However, risks include recent cybersecurity incidents and margin compression from 2023 peaks. The company's shift toward AI and recurring revenue models supports long-term growth potential despite near-term execution challenges.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Investor sentiment on Pluang

What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days

NBIS
53% Buy47% Sell
Avg holding period · 24 Days
TRI

No sentiment data available yet.

Top news

Latest headlines on both assets

About Nebius Group NV

Nebius Group N.V. is a technology company specializing in AI, machine learning, and cloud computing solutions. The company provides a range of enterprise-level cloud services, including large-scale data processing, advanced analytics, and AI model development and deployment. Nebius Group focuses on serving businesses that require high-performance, scalable, and secure infrastructure to handle complex computational tasks and accelerate their digital transformation.

Read more on NBIS →

About Thomson Reuters Corp

Thomson Reuters is the result of the $17.6 billion megamerger of Canada's Thomson and the United Kingdom's Reuters Group in 2008 and the 2018 carve-out of its finance and risk business, Refinitiv, in which it holds a 45% stake. In 2019, the company agreed to exchange its 45% stake in Refinitiv for a 15% stake in LSE, which closed in early 2021. Since the divestiture, the company is more concentrated on selling its flagship legal data and software, Westlaw, and its tax accounting software, Onesource. Reuters sees roughly 80% of revenue and 70% of expenses attributed to the United States, while the remainder (largely through the global print and Reuters News segments) is distributed across Latin America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia-Pacific.

Read more on TRI →