Compare Morgan Stanley (MS) vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Morgan Stanley vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF — how do they compare? Morgan Stanley trades at $188.06 (market cap $294.39B), while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF trades at $309.1 (market cap $113.40B). The key difference: Morgan Stanley is far larger — about 2.6× Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF's market cap, and Morgan Stanley pays a 2.45% dividend while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Morgan Stanley for 93 Days and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF for 54 Days on average.
| MS | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $294.39B | $113.40B |
Volume | 5,836,423 | 2,866,236 |
Sector | Financials | Broad Market / Factor |
52-Week High | $228.42 | $312.76 |
52-Week Low | $151.86 | $229.87 |
Typical Hold Time | 93 Days | 54 Days |
Enterprise Value | $660.04B | — |
Dividend Yield | 2.45% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Morgan Stanley (MS) trades at $189.71, down 0.66% with bearish technical signals despite strong fundamentals. The company has delivered three consecutive earnings beats with Q2 2026 EPS of $3.46 beating expectations by $0.57. Revenue growth accelerated to $66.0 billion in 2025 with net income margin expanding to 27.59%. Analyst consensus remains bullish with 55.77% buy ratings and a $229.25 price target representing 21% upside potential.
The investment case balances strong profitability and growth opportunities in wealth management and AI financing against concerning cash flow trends and technical weakness. While valuation appears reasonable at 15.14 P/E, investors face risks from volatile operating cash flows and rising debt levels. The stock offers attractive upside to analyst targets but requires monitoring of capital markets recovery timing.
QQQM trades at $308.42, down 1.15% on the day, while maintaining a bullish technical outlook with strong moving average support. The ETF's lower 0.15% expense ratio compared to QQQ's 0.18% provides a cost advantage, though trading spreads can impact returns. Recent institutional buying includes QRG Capital Management increasing its position by 207.5% during Q2 2026, signaling confidence in the Nasdaq-100 exposure.
The ETF offers pure Nasdaq-100 exposure with competitive fees, though investors should be aware of concentration risk in technology stocks and potential tax implications of distributions. Technical indicators suggest near-term support at $305 with resistance at $311, while institutional accumulation supports the bullish case for long-term growth investors.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Morgan Stanley
Morgan Stanley is a global investment bank whose history, through its legacy firms, can be traced back to 1924. The company has institutional securities, wealth management, and investment management segments. The company had about $5 trillion of client assets as well as over 70,000 employees at the end of 2021. Approximately 50% of the company's net revenue is from its institutional securities business, with the remainder coming from wealth and investment management. The company derives about 30% of its total revenue outside the Americas.
Read more on MS →About Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
QQQM is an ETF designed to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It provides exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ. Positioned as a lower-cost and more long-term-investor-friendly alternative to its peer QQQ, QQQM offers the same fundamental market exposure but typically has a lower share price and is structured to appeal to investors focused on accumulation rather than active trading.
Read more on QQQM →
