Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. vs Under Armour Inc Class A — how do they compare? Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. trades at $188.91 (market cap $91.27B), while Under Armour Inc Class A trades at $5.26 (market cap $2.26B). The key difference: Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. is far larger — about 40.4× Under Armour Inc Class A's market cap, and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. pays a 2.07% dividend while Under Armour Inc Class A pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| MRSH | UAA | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $91.27B | $2.26B |
Sector | Financials | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $211.21 | $8.14 |
52-Week Low | $157.32 | $4.17 |
Enterprise Value | $111.95B | $3.24B |
Dividend Yield | 2.07% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) trades at $189.13, down 0.87% on the day, with a bullish technical signal and strong fundamental performance. Recent earnings beats in Q2 2026, with EPS of $2.96 versus $2.88 expected, and 6% revenue growth highlight operational strength. The company announced the acquisition of Accel to expand its Midwest insurance reach, signaling strategic growth. Valuation metrics show a P/E of 23.35 and robust profitability with a net income margin of 14.24%.
The outlook remains positive with a consensus price target of $202.89, offering potential upside. Risks include margin pressure from rising expenses and soft P&C pricing. Institutional activity is mixed, with Bank of America reducing its stake while others like Bank of Nova Scotia increased holdings. The stock presents a solid long-term growth opportunity amid cyclical insurance sector headwinds.
Under Armour (UAA) is trading at $5.265, down 10.15% with bearish technical signals despite recent earnings beats. The company faces significant fundamental challenges with negative net income margins (-9.99%) and declining revenue trends from $5.7B in 2024 to $5.2B in 2025. Recent Q1 2027 earnings showed a profit beat but weaker revenue and cautious guidance, reflecting ongoing struggles in North American and Asia-Pacific markets. Cash flow remains negative at -$362M for 2025, though valuation ratios like P/S of 0.46 appear attractive relative to peers.
The outlook remains challenging with persistent revenue declines and profitability issues offset by potential value opportunities. Key risks include weak consumer spending, inventory management challenges, and competitive pressures. Analyst consensus is mixed with 27% buy ratings but a $6.67 price target suggesting 27% upside from current levels, though institutional sentiment appears cautious given the technical bearish signals and fundamental headwinds.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc is a professional services firm that provides advice and solutions in the areas of risk, strategy, and human capital. The company operates through two main segments: risk and insurance services and consulting. In risk and insurance services, the firm offers services via Marsh (an insurance broker) and Guy Carpenter (a risk and reinsurance specialist). The consulting division comprises Mercer (a provider of human resource services) and Oliver Wyman (management and economic consultancy).
Read more on MRSH →Under Armour develops, markets, and distributes athletic apparel, footwear, and accessories in North America and other territories. Consumers of its apparel include professional and amateur athletes, sponsored college and professional teams, and people with active lifestyles. The company sells merchandise through direct-to-consumer, including e-commerce and more than 400 combined factory house and brand house stores, and wholesale channels. Under Armour also operates a digital fitness app called MapMyFitness. The Baltimore-based company was founded in 1996.
Read more on UAA →