Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. vs Smith & Nephew plc — how do they compare? Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. trades at $188.75 (market cap $91.27B), while Smith & Nephew plc trades at $29.87 (market cap $12.54B). The key difference: Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. is far larger — about 7.3× Smith & Nephew plc's market cap, and Smith & Nephew plc pays the higher dividend (2.65%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| MRSH | SNN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $91.27B | $12.54B |
Sector | Financials | Health |
52-Week High | $211.21 | $38.70 |
52-Week Low | $157.32 | $28.73 |
Enterprise Value | $111.95B | $15.57B |
Dividend Yield | 2.07% | 2.65% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) trades at $189.13, down 0.87% on the day, with a bullish technical signal and strong fundamental performance. Recent earnings beats in Q2 2026, with EPS of $2.96 versus $2.88 expected, and 6% revenue growth highlight operational strength. The company announced the acquisition of Accel to expand its Midwest insurance reach, signaling strategic growth. Valuation metrics show a P/E of 23.35 and robust profitability with a net income margin of 14.24%.
The outlook remains positive with a consensus price target of $202.89, offering potential upside. Risks include margin pressure from rising expenses and soft P&C pricing. Institutional activity is mixed, with Bank of America reducing its stake while others like Bank of Nova Scotia increased holdings. The stock presents a solid long-term growth opportunity amid cyclical insurance sector headwinds.
Smith & Nephew (SNN) trades at $29.76, down 1.06% with bearish technical signals. The company shows improving fundamentals with revenue growth from $5.8B to $6.2B and net income margin expanding to 10.08% in 2025. Recent Q2 2026 earnings beat expectations but the company lowered full-year revenue guidance from 6% to 4% growth due to U.S. Orthopaedics weakness.
While valuation multiples appear reasonable (P/E 20.41, EV/EBITDA 9.9), the stock faces headwinds from mixed earnings performance and cautious analyst sentiment. The primary investment case hinges on execution in robotics and wound care segments offsetting orthopedic challenges, with downside risk from continued U.S. market softness.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc is a professional services firm that provides advice and solutions in the areas of risk, strategy, and human capital. The company operates through two main segments: risk and insurance services and consulting. In risk and insurance services, the firm offers services via Marsh (an insurance broker) and Guy Carpenter (a risk and reinsurance specialist). The consulting division comprises Mercer (a provider of human resource services) and Oliver Wyman (management and economic consultancy).
Read more on MRSH →Smith & Nephew designs, manufactures, and markets orthopedic devices, sports medicine and arthroscopic technologies, and wound-care solutions. Roughly 42% of the U.K.-based firm's revenue comes from orthopedic products, and another 30% is sports medicine and ENT. The remaining 28% of revenue is from the advanced wound therapy segment. Roughly half of Smith & Nephew's total revenue comes from the United States, just over 30% is from other developed markets, and emerging markets account for the remainder.
Read more on SNN →