Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. vs Nasdaq100 ETF — how do they compare? Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. trades at $175.76 (market cap $84.31B), while Nasdaq100 ETF trades at $751.27 (market cap $506.92B). The key difference: Nasdaq100 ETF is far larger — about 6× Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.'s market cap, and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. pays a 2.24% dividend while Nasdaq100 ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. for 109 Days and Nasdaq100 ETF for 162 Days on average.
| MRSH | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $84.31B | $506.92B |
Volume | 3,948,947 | 48,326,518 |
Sector | Financials | — |
52-Week High | $207.02 | $759.66 |
52-Week Low | $157.32 | $558.34 |
Typical Hold Time | 109 Days | 162 Days |
Enterprise Value | $104.99B | — |
Dividend Yield | 2.24% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Marsh (MRSH) trades at $176.67, up 1.73% today, near its consensus price target of $202.71. The stock shows a bullish technical trend with support at $174 and resistance at $178. Recent earnings beats and the acquisition of Accel Holdings highlight strong operational momentum. Revenue grew to $27.0B in 2025, with a net income margin of 14.24% and a P/E ratio of 21.57, indicating solid profitability amid moderate valuation.
The outlook remains positive with consistent earnings outperformance and strategic acquisitions driving growth. Risks include elevated debt levels and potential margin pressure. Analysts are mostly neutral (65% Hold), but the stock offers upside to the price target. Investors should weigh strong cash flow generation against macroeconomic sensitivities in the insurance sector.
QQQ trades at $747.64, down 1.33% on the day, with technical indicators showing a bullish trend supported by moving averages while oscillators remain neutral. The ETF maintains strong institutional interest despite mixed analyst sentiment. Recent news highlights QQQ's concentration in technology stocks and ongoing comparisons with lower-cost alternatives like VOO and QQQM.
The outlook remains positive given QQQ's exposure to leading tech innovators and AI-driven growth potential, though elevated valuations and interest rate sensitivity present near-term risks. Long-term growth prospects appear solid, but investors should monitor concentration risk and fee differentials among competing ETFs.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc is a professional services firm that provides advice and solutions in the areas of risk, strategy, and human capital. The company operates through two main segments: risk and insurance services and consulting. In risk and insurance services, the firm offers services via Marsh (an insurance broker) and Guy Carpenter (a risk and reinsurance specialist). The consulting division comprises Mercer (a provider of human resource services) and Oliver Wyman (management and economic consultancy).
Read more on MRSH →The ETF is designed to track the performance of the securities and the stocks in the NASDAQ-100 Index. To maintain the composition and weightings, the advisor adjusts the ETF from time to time to conform to periodic changes in the index target.
Read more on QQQ →