Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. vs Procter & Gamble Co — how do they compare? Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. trades at $191.32 (market cap $91.05B), while Procter & Gamble Co trades at $145.14 (market cap $340.39B). The key difference: Procter & Gamble Co is far larger — about 3.7× Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.'s market cap, and Procter & Gamble Co pays the higher dividend (2.97%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| MRSH | PG | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $91.05B | $340.39B |
Sector | Financials | Consumer Staples |
52-Week High | $211.21 | $167.18 |
52-Week Low | $157.32 | $138.10 |
Enterprise Value | $111.73B | $366.23B |
Dividend Yield | 2.08% | 2.97% |
Volume | — | 6,423,436 |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) trades at $191.65, down 0.85% on the day, with a bullish technical signal and strong fundamentals. The stock has consistently beaten earnings estimates in recent quarters, with Q2 2026 EPS of $2.96 exceeding expectations. Revenue growth remains solid at 6% in Q2 2026, while the company maintains healthy profitability with a 14.24% net income margin. Recent acquisitions and AI investments highlight strategic growth initiatives.
The outlook for MRSH is positive, supported by earnings momentum and a consensus price target of $202.89 offering potential upside. However, margin pressure from rising expenses and soft P&C pricing present near-term risks. Institutional activity shows mixed sentiment, with some firms increasing stakes while others reduce holdings.
Procter & Gamble (PG) trades at $146.38, up 0.42% today, with a bearish technical signal but strong fundamentals. The stock has consistently beaten earnings estimates in recent quarters, with Q3 2026 EPS expected at $1.90. Revenue reached $84.28B in 2025, with a net income margin of 18.44% and robust cash flow from operations of $17.82B. Analyst consensus is bullish with a $161.20 price target, though valuation multiples like P/E of 22.12 and P/S of 4.08 are at premiums to peers.
The outlook for PG is positive due to steady earnings growth and dividend reliability, but risks include premium valuation concerns and soft demand headwinds. Investors may find opportunity in its defensive qualities amid market volatility, though near-term upside could be limited by technical resistance and modest revenue growth projections.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc is a professional services firm that provides advice and solutions in the areas of risk, strategy, and human capital. The company operates through two main segments: risk and insurance services and consulting. In risk and insurance services, the firm offers services via Marsh (an insurance broker) and Guy Carpenter (a risk and reinsurance specialist). The consulting division comprises Mercer (a provider of human resource services) and Oliver Wyman (management and economic consultancy).
Read more on MRSH →The Procter & Gamble Company manufactures and markets consumer products in countries throughout the world. The Company provides products in the laundry and cleaning, paper, beauty care, food and beverage, and health care segments. Procter & Gamble products are sold primarily through mass merchandisers, grocery stores, membership club stores, drug stores, and neighborhood stores.
Read more on PG →