Compare Marqeta Inc (MQ) vs Yum China Holdings Inc (YUMC) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Marqeta Inc vs Yum China Holdings Inc — how do they compare? Marqeta Inc trades at $17.21 (market cap $1.85B), while Yum China Holdings Inc trades at $43.48 (market cap $15.09B). The key difference: Yum China Holdings Inc is far larger — about 8.2× Marqeta Inc's market cap, and Yum China Holdings Inc pays a 2.64% dividend while Marqeta Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| MQ | YUMC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $1.85B | $15.09B |
Sector | Technology | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $27.32 | $57.95 |
52-Week Low | $15.04 | $40.18 |
Enterprise Value | $1.15B | $15.98B |
Dividend Yield | — | 2.64% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
MQ trades at $17.44, down slightly by 0.29% today. The stock shows a bullish technical trend with strong moving average signals, though RSI levels suggest potential overbought conditions. Recent financials reveal revenue growth to $624.88M in 2025, but profitability remains weak with a net margin of -2.23%. The company's expansion into Europe with Expensify and a recent 4:1 reverse stock split are key developments. Analyst consensus is a 'Buy' with a $19.00 price target, indicating modest upside potential.
MQ presents a cautious opportunity with growth initiatives offset by profitability challenges. The stock's high P/E of 439 reflects investor optimism on future earnings, but thin margins and inconsistent quarterly results pose risks. Upside depends on successful execution of European expansion and sustained revenue growth, while downside risks include competitive pressures and failure to achieve profitability. Institutional sentiment is mixed, with 59% of analysts recommending 'Hold'.
YUMC trades at $42.77, down 2.51% today, with a bullish technical outlook supported by moving averages despite overbought RSI readings. The company shows consistent revenue growth, reaching $11.80B in 2025, and has beaten earnings estimates in three consecutive quarters. Recent strategic moves include the acquisition of Pizza Hut China, enhancing local control and cost synergies. Analyst sentiment remains strongly positive with 14 buy ratings and no sell recommendations.
The outlook for YUMC is favorable due to solid fundamentals and strategic initiatives, though risks include macroeconomic headwinds in China and competitive pressures. Valuation metrics like a P/E of 16.83 and EV/EBITDA of 8.76 suggest reasonable pricing relative to earnings, supporting potential upside if execution continues to exceed expectations.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Marqeta Inc
Headquartered in Oakland, California, and founded in 2010, Marqeta provides its clients with a card-issuing platform that offers the infrastructure and tools necessary to offer digital, physical, and tokenized payment options without the need for a traditional bank. The company's open APIs are designed to allow third parties like DoorDash, Klarna, and Block to rapidly develop and deploy innovative card-based products and payment services without the need to develop the underlying technology. The company generates revenue primarily through processing and ATM fees for cards issued on its platform.
Read more on MQ →About Yum China Holdings Inc
With almost 10,600 units and USD 9.5 billion in systemwide sales in 2020, Yum China is the largest restaurant chain in China. It generates revenue through its own restaurants and franchise fees. Key concepts include KFC (7,166 units) and Pizza Hut (2,355), but the company's portfolio also includes other brands such as Little Sheep, East Dawning, Taco Bell, Huang Ji Huang, COFFii & Joy, and Lavazza (collectively representing about 985 units). Yum China is a trademark licensee of Yum Brands, paying 3% of total systemwide sales to the company it separated from in October 2016.
Read more on YUMC →
