Compare Marqeta Inc (MQ) vs Yum China Holdings Inc (YUMC) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Marqeta Inc vs Yum China Holdings Inc — how do they compare? Marqeta Inc trades at $18.09 (market cap $1.82B), while Yum China Holdings Inc trades at $42.88 (market cap $14.11B). The key difference: Yum China Holdings Inc is far larger — about 7.8× Marqeta Inc's market cap, and Yum China Holdings Inc pays a 2.78% dividend while Marqeta Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Marqeta Inc for 44 Days and Yum China Holdings Inc for 77 Days on average.
| MQ | YUMC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $1.82B | $14.11B |
Volume | 1,126,466 | 2,350,650 |
Sector | Technology | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $20.32 | $57.95 |
52-Week Low | $15.04 | $39.98 |
Typical Hold Time | 44 Days | 77 Days |
Enterprise Value | $1.13B | $15.02B |
Dividend Yield | — | 2.78% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Marqeta (MQ) trades at $17.86, up 4.69% with a bullish technical outlook. The company shows improving fundamentals with three consecutive quarterly earnings beats and positive cash flow generation in 2025. Recent partnerships with BVNK for stablecoin cards and Google for kids' wallets highlight strategic growth initiatives. However, valuation remains elevated with a P/E of 193.83 and EV/EBITDA of 54.37 despite modest profitability metrics.
MQ presents a mixed investment case with strong operational momentum but premium valuation. The stock offers growth potential through expanding payment partnerships and product innovation, though faces risks from contract renewals and competitive pressure. Analyst consensus at $11.38 suggests caution despite recent positive earnings revisions and institutional interest in the fintech sector.
YUMC trades at $42.99, up 5.76% today, with a bearish technical signal but strong fundamentals. Recent earnings beats and a 73.68% analyst buy consensus highlight positive momentum. The company completed the Pizza Hut China brand acquisition and expanded its Burger Bar concept, signaling growth initiatives. Cash flow from operations remains robust at $1.47B for 2025, though net cash flow is negative due to financing activities.
The outlook is mixed: solid earnings growth and expansion potential support upside, but technical weakness and competitive pressures pose risks. Investors should weigh the attractive valuation (P/E 15.3) against near-term price volatility and market sentiment headwinds.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
About Marqeta Inc
Headquartered in Oakland, California, and founded in 2010, Marqeta provides its clients with a card-issuing platform that offers the infrastructure and tools necessary to offer digital, physical, and tokenized payment options without the need for a traditional bank. The company's open APIs are designed to allow third parties like DoorDash, Klarna, and Block to rapidly develop and deploy innovative card-based products and payment services without the need to develop the underlying technology. The company generates revenue primarily through processing and ATM fees for cards issued on its platform.
Read more on MQ →About Yum China Holdings Inc
With almost 10,600 units and USD 9.5 billion in systemwide sales in 2020, Yum China is the largest restaurant chain in China. It generates revenue through its own restaurants and franchise fees. Key concepts include KFC (7,166 units) and Pizza Hut (2,355), but the company's portfolio also includes other brands such as Little Sheep, East Dawning, Taco Bell, Huang Ji Huang, COFFii & Joy, and Lavazza (collectively representing about 985 units). Yum China is a trademark licensee of Yum Brands, paying 3% of total systemwide sales to the company it separated from in October 2016.
Read more on YUMC →
