Compare Marqeta Inc (MQ) vs Viatris Inc (VTRS) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Marqeta Inc vs Viatris Inc — how do they compare? Marqeta Inc trades at $17.89 (market cap $1.82B), while Viatris Inc trades at $17.64 (market cap $20.03B). The key difference: Viatris Inc is far larger — about 11× Marqeta Inc's market cap, and Viatris Inc pays a 2.75% dividend while Marqeta Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Marqeta Inc for 44 Days and Viatris Inc for 57 Days on average.
| MQ | VTRS | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $1.82B | $20.03B |
Volume | 1,126,466 | 14,109,977 |
Sector | Technology | Health |
52-Week High | $20.32 | $18.27 |
52-Week Low | $15.04 | $9.74 |
Typical Hold Time | 44 Days | 57 Days |
Enterprise Value | $1.13B | $32.15B |
Dividend Yield | — | 2.75% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Marqeta (MQ) trades at $17.86, up 4.69% with a bullish technical outlook. The company shows improving fundamentals with three consecutive quarterly earnings beats and positive cash flow generation in 2025. Recent partnerships with BVNK for stablecoin cards and Google for kids' wallets highlight strategic growth initiatives. However, valuation remains elevated with a P/E of 193.83 and EV/EBITDA of 54.37 despite modest profitability metrics.
MQ presents a mixed investment case with strong operational momentum but premium valuation. The stock offers growth potential through expanding payment partnerships and product innovation, though faces risks from contract renewals and competitive pressure. Analyst consensus at $11.38 suggests caution despite recent positive earnings revisions and institutional interest in the fintech sector.
Viatris (VTRS) trades at $17.625, up 0.77% with a bullish technical signal. The company shows mixed fundamentals with declining revenue from $16.3B in 2022 to $14.3B in 2025 and negative net income margins, though recent quarters have beaten EPS estimates. Positive cash flow trends and a $0.12 dividend signal financial stability. Analyst consensus is mixed with 38% buy ratings and a $22.17 price target suggesting 26% upside.
The outlook balances operational strength against profitability challenges. Investment appeal lies in value metrics (P/S 1.38), consistent earnings beats, and dividend yield, but risks include sustained negative margins, high debt, and competitive pressures. The stock's re-rating depends on margin improvement and pipeline execution.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Marqeta Inc
Headquartered in Oakland, California, and founded in 2010, Marqeta provides its clients with a card-issuing platform that offers the infrastructure and tools necessary to offer digital, physical, and tokenized payment options without the need for a traditional bank. The company's open APIs are designed to allow third parties like DoorDash, Klarna, and Block to rapidly develop and deploy innovative card-based products and payment services without the need to develop the underlying technology. The company generates revenue primarily through processing and ATM fees for cards issued on its platform.
Read more on MQ →About Viatris Inc
Formed by the combination of Mylan and Pfizer's Upjohn business in 2020, Viatris is one of the world's largest generic drug manufacturers, with a substantial off-patent branded drug portfolio. Its portfolio consists of more than 1,400 molecules with penetration across most of the developed world and in select emerging markets. The company's branded drug portfolio consists of off-patent blockbuster drugs that continue to generate strong sales, including Lipitor, Norvasc, Lyrica, Viagra, and EpiPen. While global competition has facilitated the commodification of small-molecule generic drugs, the company has demonstrated an edge over peers in its ability to manufacture complex generics (for example, generic Advair and Copaxone).
Read more on VTRS →
