Compare Marqeta Inc (MQ) vs Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Marqeta Inc vs Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF — how do they compare? Marqeta Inc trades at $17.36 (market cap $1.82B), while Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF trades at $71.97 (market cap $6.94B). The key difference: Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF is far larger — about 3.8× Marqeta Inc's market cap, and Marqeta Inc is trading nearer its 52-week high, Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Marqeta Inc for 44 Days and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF for 123 Days on average.
| MQ | SPLV | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $1.82B | $6.94B |
Volume | 1,126,466 | 1,663,703 |
Sector | Technology | — |
52-Week High | $20.32 | $77.97 |
52-Week Low | $15.04 | $70.30 |
Typical Hold Time | 44 Days | 123 Days |
Enterprise Value | $1.13B | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Marqeta (MQ) trades at $17.06, up 3.08% with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The company shows improving fundamentals with three consecutive quarterly EPS beats and revenue growth from $507M in 2024 to projected $677M in 2026. Recent partnerships with BVNK for stablecoin cards and Google for wallet expansion highlight strategic growth initiatives. However, valuation metrics remain elevated with a P/E of 189.56 and EV/EBITDA of 52.44 despite modest profitability margins.
MQ presents a mixed outlook with strong operational momentum but premium valuation. The stock offers growth potential through expanding payment partnerships and enterprise adoption, though faces risks from contract renewals in Q3 2026 and competitive pressure. Analyst consensus of $11.38 suggests caution despite recent bullish earnings revisions and institutional interest in the digital payments space.
SPLV trades at $71.22, down 0.71% with a bearish technical outlook. The ETF shows neutral oscillators but bearish moving averages, with key resistance at $72. Recent news highlights sector overweights in Utilities and Real Estate as headwinds, with the fund lagging the S&P 500's performance. Dividend payments of $0.14 are scheduled for July and September 2026.
Outlook remains cautious due to technical weakness and unappealing growth-adjusted valuation. Risks include concentrated sector exposure and macroeconomic pressures. The fund's low-volatility strategy may appeal during market uncertainty, but current technicals suggest limited near-term upside potential.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
About Marqeta Inc
Headquartered in Oakland, California, and founded in 2010, Marqeta provides its clients with a card-issuing platform that offers the infrastructure and tools necessary to offer digital, physical, and tokenized payment options without the need for a traditional bank. The company's open APIs are designed to allow third parties like DoorDash, Klarna, and Block to rapidly develop and deploy innovative card-based products and payment services without the need to develop the underlying technology. The company generates revenue primarily through processing and ATM fees for cards issued on its platform.
Read more on MQ →About Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. Strictly in accordance with its guidelines and mandated procedures, S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC (the "index Provider") compiles, maintains and calculates the underlying index, which is designed to measure the performance of the 100 least volatile constituents of the S&P 500 ® Index over the past 12 months as determined by the index Provider.
Read more on SPLV →
