Compare Monolithic Power Systems Inc (MPWR) vs Trip.com Group Ltd (TCOM) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Monolithic Power Systems Inc vs Trip.com Group Ltd — how do they compare? Monolithic Power Systems Inc trades at $1,203.07 (market cap $59.88B), while Trip.com Group Ltd trades at $39.39 (market cap $26.04B). The key difference: Monolithic Power Systems Inc is far larger — about 2.3× Trip.com Group Ltd's market cap, and Monolithic Power Systems Inc pays the higher dividend (0.66%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| MPWR | TCOM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $59.88B | $26.04B |
Sector | Utilities | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $1.69K | $78.96 |
52-Week Low | $834.14 | $39.19 |
Enterprise Value | $58.49B | $18.64B |
Dividend Yield | 0.66% | 0.42% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
MPWR trades at $1,218.50, down 0.44% on the day, with technical indicators showing bearish momentum despite recent earnings beats. The company reported strong Q2 2026 results with EPS of $6.50 beating expectations of $5.87, driven by AI infrastructure demand. Valuation remains elevated with a P/E of 74.34 and P/S of 18.21, while profitability metrics show robust net income margin of 24.5% and ROE of 21.98%.
The stock faces near-term technical pressure but maintains strong fundamental growth prospects from AI and server demand. Analyst consensus remains overwhelmingly bullish with 88% buy ratings and a $1,860 price target representing 53% upside. Key risks include premium valuation concerns and potential double-ordering in enterprise data segments.
Trip.com (TCOM) trades at $40.50, down 1.29% with bearish technical signals despite strong fundamentals. The company reported robust 2025 results with $62.41B revenue and 53.34% net margin, though recent quarters show earnings misses. Valuation metrics appear attractive with P/E of 6.01 and EV/EBITDA of 3.21. However, the stock faces headwinds from a recent $770M Chinese antitrust penalty and declining cash flow trends.
The investment case balances deep value against regulatory risks. Analyst consensus remains bullish with $59.29 price target (47% upside), but technical weakness and China regulatory overhang create near-term uncertainty. Long-term growth prospects in travel recovery support the bull case, though investors should monitor Q2 2026 earnings due September 15 for confirmation of business momentum.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Monolithic Power Systems Inc
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. is a global leader in high-performance, analog, and mixed-signal semiconductors. The company specializes in power management solutions, providing integrated circuits (ICs) for a wide range of applications, including computing, automotive, industrial, and communications. MPWR's proprietary process technology is designed to deliver highly energy-efficient and compact power solutions, positioning the company as a key supplier for the next generation of electronic devices.
Read more on MPWR →About Trip.com Group Ltd
Trip.com is the largest online travel agent in China and is positioned to benefit from the country's rising demand for higher-margin outbound travel as passport penetration is only 12% in China. The company generated about 78% of sales from accommodation reservations and transportation ticketing in 2020. The rest of revenue comes from package tours and corporate travel. Prior to the pandemic in 2019, the company generated 25% of revenue from international business, which is important to its margin expansion. Most of sales come from websites and mobile platforms, while the rest come from call centers. The competes in a crowded OTA industry in China, including Meituan, Alibaba-backed Fliggy, Toncheng, and Qunar. The company was founded in 1999 and listed on the Nasdaq in December 2003.
Read more on TCOM →
