Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare Monolithic Power Systems Inc (MPWR) vs NetEase Inc (NTES) Price & Performance

Monolithic Power Systems IncTrade
NetEase IncTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

Monolithic Power Systems Inc vs NetEase Inc — how do they compare? Monolithic Power Systems Inc trades at $1,361.12 (market cap $67.32B), while NetEase Inc trades at $124.75 (market cap $76.09B). The key difference: Monolithic Power Systems Inc and NetEase Inc are close in size by market cap, and NetEase Inc pays the higher dividend (2.45%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Monolithic Power Systems Inc for 25 Days and NetEase Inc for 74 Days on average.

MPWRNTES
Market Cap
$67.32B$76.09B
Volume
826,960486,447
Sector
TechnologyTechnology
52-Week High
$1.69K$152.85
52-Week Low
$856.96$109.26
Typical Hold Time
25 Days74 Days
Enterprise Value
$65.92B$51.81B
Dividend Yield
0.58%2.45%

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

Monolithic Power Systems Inc

MPWR trades at $1,425.98, down 3.24% today but maintains strong technical momentum with bullish moving averages and key support at $1,417. The company demonstrates robust fundamentals with 24.5% net margins and consistent earnings beats, while expanding manufacturing capacity through the GlobalFoundries partnership announced September 9, 2026. Analyst sentiment remains overwhelmingly positive with 88% buy ratings and a $1,830 consensus price target representing 28% upside potential.

MPWR presents compelling growth exposure to AI infrastructure demand but carries premium valuation risks. The stock's 83.6 P/E ratio requires sustained high growth execution, while insider selling and competitive pressures warrant monitoring. Current technical positioning near pivot point resistance at $1,427 suggests near-term consolidation before potential breakout toward analyst targets.

NetEase Inc

NetEase (NTES) trades at $120.61, up 1.29% with mixed technical signals showing neutral momentum. The company demonstrates strong fundamentals with $112.63B revenue and 27.88% net margin in 2025, though recent quarterly earnings show volatility with two misses in the last three quarters. Analyst consensus remains strongly bullish with 82% buy ratings and a $168 price target representing 39% upside potential.

The investment case balances strong profitability and cash generation against earnings volatility and competitive pressures. Key opportunities include consistent revenue growth and attractive valuation multiples, while risks center on gaming market competition and China regulatory environment. The stock presents value for long-term investors given the significant discount to analyst targets.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Investor sentiment on Pluang

What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days

MPWR
100% Buy0% Sell
Avg holding period · 25 Days
NTES
54% Buy46% Sell
Avg holding period · 74 Days

Top news

Latest headlines on both assets

About Monolithic Power Systems Inc

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. is a global leader in high-performance, analog, and mixed-signal semiconductors. The company specializes in power management solutions, providing integrated circuits (ICs) for a wide range of applications, including computing, automotive, industrial, and communications. MPWR's proprietary process technology is designed to deliver highly energy-efficient and compact power solutions, positioning the company as a key supplier for the next generation of electronic devices.

Read more on MPWR →

About NetEase Inc

NetEase, which started on an internet portal service in 1997, is a leading online services provider in China. Its key services include online/mobile games, cloud music, media, advertising, email, live streaming, online education, and e-commerce. The company develops and operates some of the China's most popular PC client and mobile games, and it partners with global leading game developers, such as Blizzard Entertainment and Mojang (a Microsoft subsidiary).

Read more on NTES →