Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) vs Yum China Holdings Inc (YUMC) Price & Performance

Monster Beverage CorpTrade
Yum China Holdings IncTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

Monster Beverage Corp vs Yum China Holdings Inc — how do they compare? Monster Beverage Corp trades at $46.06 (market cap $89.20B), while Yum China Holdings Inc trades at $47.4 (market cap $16.28B). The key difference: Monster Beverage Corp is far larger — about 5.5× Yum China Holdings Inc's market cap, and Yum China Holdings Inc pays a 2.44% dividend while Monster Beverage Corp pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.

MNSTYUMC
Market Cap
$89.20B$16.28B
Sector
Consumer StaplesConsumer Cyclical
52-Week High
$49.97$57.95
52-Week Low
$30.86$40.18
Enterprise Value
$87.49B$17.19B
Dividend Yield
2.44%

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

Monster Beverage Corp

Monster Beverage (MNST) trades at $45.895, up 0.45% with a bearish technical signal despite recent earnings beats. The company shows strong fundamentals with 2025 revenue of $8.29B and net income of $1.91B, achieving a 23.08% net margin. Recent Q2 2026 results beat expectations with $0.60 EPS versus $0.59 expected, driven by international growth. A 2-for-1 stock split occurred on August 11, 2026, while analyst consensus remains positive with 51% buy ratings and a $51.14 price target.

MNST's outlook is supported by robust earnings growth and global expansion, but elevated valuation ratios (P/E 42.16, P/S 9.75) pose risks. Competitive pressures in the energy drink sector and macroeconomic sensitivity could challenge margins. Institutional sentiment is cautiously optimistic, with upside potential to the consensus target representing 11% gain from current levels.

Yum China Holdings Inc

YUMC trades at $47.92, down 0.56% on the day, with a bullish technical signal supported by moving averages. The company demonstrates consistent fundamental strength with Q2 2026 earnings beating estimates, revenue growth of 13% year-over-year, and a net income margin of 7.84%. Recent completion of the Pizza Hut China acquisition for $1.2 billion positions the company for strategic growth and cost synergies.

The outlook remains positive with strong analyst support (73.68% buy ratings) and a 26.21% upside potential. Key risks include Chinese macroeconomic headwinds and integration challenges from the Pizza Hut acquisition. Earnings momentum and valuation metrics suggest continued growth potential for investors.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Top news

Latest headlines on both assets

About Monster Beverage Corp

Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.

Read more on MNST

About Yum China Holdings Inc

With almost 10,600 units and USD 9.5 billion in systemwide sales in 2020, Yum China is the largest restaurant chain in China. It generates revenue through its own restaurants and franchise fees. Key concepts include KFC (7,166 units) and Pizza Hut (2,355), but the company's portfolio also includes other brands such as Little Sheep, East Dawning, Taco Bell, Huang Ji Huang, COFFii & Joy, and Lavazza (collectively representing about 985 units). Yum China is a trademark licensee of Yum Brands, paying 3% of total systemwide sales to the company it separated from in October 2016.

Read more on YUMC