Monster Beverage Corp vs Schlumberger NV — how do they compare? Monster Beverage Corp trades at $45.6 (market cap $89.56B), while Schlumberger NV trades at $53.7 (market cap $78.96B). The key difference: Monster Beverage Corp and Schlumberger NV are close in size by market cap, and Schlumberger NV pays a 2.22% dividend while Monster Beverage Corp pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| MNST | SLB | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $89.56B | $78.96B |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Energy |
52-Week High | $49.97 | $58.01 |
52-Week Low | $30.86 | $31.72 |
Enterprise Value | $87.85B | $87.68B |
Dividend Yield | — | 2.22% |
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.
Read more on MNST →Schlumberger is the largest oilfield service firm in the world, with expertise in myriad disciplines, including reservoir performance, well construction, production enhancement, and more recently, digital solutions. It maintains a reputation as one of the industry's leading innovators, which has earned it dominant share in numerous end markets.
Read more on SLB →