Compare Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) vs Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Monster Beverage Corp vs Nomura Holdings Inc — how do they compare? Monster Beverage Corp trades at $93.91 (market cap $93.35B), while Nomura Holdings Inc trades at $9.4 (market cap $27.46B). The key difference: Monster Beverage Corp is far larger — about 3.4× Nomura Holdings Inc's market cap, and Nomura Holdings Inc pays a 3.45% dividend while Monster Beverage Corp pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| MNST | NMR | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $93.35B | $27.46B |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Financials |
52-Week High | $99.94 | $10.04 |
52-Week Low | $58.75 | $6.39 |
Enterprise Value | $91.65B | — |
Dividend Yield | — | 3.45% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Monster Beverage (MNST) trades at $94.46, down 3.12% on the day, with a bullish technical outlook supported by moving averages and ADX signals. The company reported strong earnings beats in recent quarters, with Q1 2026 EPS of $0.58 exceeding the $0.527 estimate, and maintains robust profitability with a net income margin of 23.11%. A 2-for-1 stock split is scheduled for August 2026, reflecting confidence in future growth.
The investment outlook is positive, driven by consistent earnings outperformance, international expansion, and product innovation. Risks include elevated valuation multiples (P/E of 46.11) and competitive pressures in the beverage sector. Analyst consensus is bullish with a $97.83 price target, suggesting modest upside from current levels.
Nomura Holdings (NMR) trades at $9.81, up 4.36% with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The company reported record annual profit of $340.74 billion for 2025, with revenue growing to $1.66 trillion and profit margin expanding to 20.49%. Recent news highlights strong wholesale revenue growth exceeding 30% and strategic acquisitions in US asset management. The stock trades at a P/E of 12.77, below industry averages, suggesting potential undervaluation.
Outlook remains positive with continued wholesale business momentum and global expansion initiatives. Key risks include integration costs from recent acquisitions and potential market volatility. Analyst consensus shows 33% buy ratings with no sell recommendations, indicating cautious optimism. The combination of reasonable valuation and strong fundamental performance supports potential upside.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About Monster Beverage Corp
Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.
Read more on MNST →About Nomura Holdings Inc
Nomura is Japan's largest broker, about twice the size of rival Daiwa Securities and roughly three times the size of the securities units of the three megabanks. It is also the largest asset-management company in Japan, with a similar size differential compared with its rivals. Despite its topnotch brand name in retail broking and asset management in Japan, Nomura has struggled to compete effectively in the institutional securities business against larger global rivals. In 2008, Nomura bought European and Asian assets of the failed Lehman Brothers, which led to a sharply higher cost base but did not provide commensurate revenue. Nomura has reduced the scale of these businesses but maintains its ambition to compete globally with the top players.
Read more on NMR →
