Compare Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) vs Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Monster Beverage Corp vs Nomura Holdings Inc — how do they compare? Monster Beverage Corp trades at $46.06 (market cap $89.20B), while Nomura Holdings Inc trades at $9.8 (market cap $28.46B). The key difference: Monster Beverage Corp is far larger — about 3.1× Nomura Holdings Inc's market cap, and Nomura Holdings Inc pays a 3.31% dividend while Monster Beverage Corp pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| MNST | NMR | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $89.20B | $28.46B |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Financials |
52-Week High | $49.97 | $10.04 |
52-Week Low | $30.86 | $6.73 |
Enterprise Value | $87.49B | — |
Dividend Yield | — | 3.31% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Monster Beverage (MNST) trades at $45.895, up 0.45% with a bearish technical signal despite recent earnings beats. The company shows strong fundamentals with 2025 revenue of $8.29B and net income of $1.91B, achieving a 23.08% net margin. Recent Q2 2026 results beat expectations with $0.60 EPS versus $0.59 expected, driven by international growth. A 2-for-1 stock split occurred on August 11, 2026, while analyst consensus remains positive with 51% buy ratings and a $51.14 price target.
MNST's outlook is supported by robust earnings growth and global expansion, but elevated valuation ratios (P/E 42.16, P/S 9.75) pose risks. Competitive pressures in the energy drink sector and macroeconomic sensitivity could challenge margins. Institutional sentiment is cautiously optimistic, with upside potential to the consensus target representing 11% gain from current levels.
Nomura Holdings (NMR) trades at $9.925, up 1.07% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages and a neutral stance from oscillators. The company reported strong revenue growth, with 2025 revenue reaching $1.66 trillion and net income of $340.74 billion, yielding a net margin of 20.4%. Recent earnings show a mix of beats and misses, with Q2 2026 EPS beating expectations. Analyst consensus leans toward Hold, with 66.67% of coverage recommending Hold and 33.33% Buy.
The outlook for NMR is supported by robust profitability and valuation metrics like a P/E of 11.59, suggesting potential undervaluation. However, risks include inconsistent cash flow from operations, rising debt-to-asset ratios, and macroeconomic sensitivity. Investors should weigh solid fundamentals against cash flow volatility and debt trends for balanced decision-making.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Monster Beverage Corp
Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.
Read more on MNST →About Nomura Holdings Inc
Nomura is Japan's largest broker, about twice the size of rival Daiwa Securities and roughly three times the size of the securities units of the three megabanks. It is also the largest asset-management company in Japan, with a similar size differential compared with its rivals. Despite its topnotch brand name in retail broking and asset management in Japan, Nomura has struggled to compete effectively in the institutional securities business against larger global rivals. In 2008, Nomura bought European and Asian assets of the failed Lehman Brothers, which led to a sharply higher cost base but did not provide commensurate revenue. Nomura has reduced the scale of these businesses but maintains its ambition to compete globally with the top players.
Read more on NMR →
